Hi Bruce, Hi Nikolay
Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion
like this.
Thanks I'm never sure where to ask what :)
As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we
will
have more kernels that are using device tree then ones that are
not.
On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote:
Hi
Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion like
this.
As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will have more
kernels that are using device tree then ones that are not.
True, but it has been like
Hi
As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will have more
kernels that are using device tree then ones that are not.
As far as I understand currently the generation of device trees is controlled
via KERNEL_DEVICETREE and is handled in via an include file
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote:
Hi
Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion
like this.
As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will
have more kernels that are using device
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov picmas...@mail.bg wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote:
Hi
Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion
like this.
As ARM now also moved to
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov picmas...@mail.bg wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 06:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov
picmas...@mail.bg wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-04-15 08:33
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 06:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov
picmas...@mail.bg wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote:
Hi
Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to