Yes, that's it.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 21:07, Fabian Sturm wrote:
>
> Hmm I guess I was way overthinking this. The idea seems to just create
> a secong image definition like this it seems:
>
>
> core-image-minimal-dev.bb:
>
> require core-image-minimal.bb
>
> DESCRIPTION = "A small image
Hmm I guess I was way overthinking this. The idea seems to just create
a secong image definition like this it seems:
core-image-minimal-dev.bb:
require core-image-minimal.bb
DESCRIPTION = "A small image just capable of allowing a device to
boot and \
is suitable for development
If you're targeting just x86 then you can build an image with the
tools-sdk IMAGE_FEATURE defined, and use something like systemd-nspawn
(insert your preferred container system) to get a shell in it.
Ross
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 18:14, Fabian Sturm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> no this is not what I am
Hi,
no this is not what I am searching for. What I want is gcc cmake and
other tools to be installed inside of the Yocto image, so that I can
compile natively in Yocto without having to hack build scripts to work
with a cross compiler.
But of course I don'T want to deliver gcc and others with
I think what you are looking for is a Yocto generated SDK for your image?
bitbake -c populate_sdk
Alex
2018-09-18 23:00 GMT+02:00 Fabian Sturm :
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering, there does not seem to be any information about native
> compile of projects in a Yocto docker container. It seems that
Hi,
I am wondering, there does not seem to be any information about native
compile of projects in a Yocto docker container. It seems that most of
the people use cross compile even though that imho is not necessary if
your target is x86 too. So here is what I want to do:
- Create a docker
