On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Yu, Ke ke...@intel.com wrote:
Seems like with the build packages and build image steps separated you could
skip the build step completly for most packages if we ship or host pre-built
build
packages
-M
Yes, current design supports this scenario, i.e. if
On 10/25/11 11:08 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Yu, Ke ke...@intel.com wrote:
Seems like with the build packages and build image steps separated you could
skip the build step completly for most packages if we ship or host
pre-built build
packages
-M
On 25/10/11 09:08, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Yu, Ke ke...@intel.com wrote:
Seems like with the build packages and build image steps separated you could
skip the build step completly for most packages if we ship or host
pre-built build
packages
-M
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Of course with ambiguous terms like *somewhere* I'm not sure we're
thinking along exactly the same lines but we're definitely looking to
speed up and re-use in as many places as possible.
Well, somewhere is
-Original Message-
From: Koen Kooi [mailto:k...@dominion.thruhere.net]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 11:54 PM
To: Yu, Ke
Cc: Yocto Project Discussion
Subject: Re: [yocto] Proposed roadmap and design for Hob improvement
Op 21 okt. 2011, om 05:16 heeft Yu, Ke het volgende
-Original Message-
From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 [mailto:b29...@freescale.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:14 AM
To: Yu, Ke
Cc: Yocto Project Discussion
Subject: Re: [yocto] Proposed roadmap and design for Hob improvement
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Yu, Ke ke
Op 21 okt. 2011, om 05:16 heeft Yu, Ke het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
As the Yocto 1.2. plan is starting
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.2_Features ), here I draft a
proposal for the roadmap and design on HOB improvement task
