Hi Marco,
On similar lines, as Joe suggested please try with refpolicy 2.20151208
from morty,
also I would like to recommend start with refpolicy-minimum policy variant,
then you can explore other variants like refpolicy-targeted.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Marco Ostini
Hi Joe & Shrikant,
Many thanks for your response. It was good to know that busybox can
function with SELinux enforcing enabled.
Sorry not to mention the policy we're currently using. It's:
refpolicy-targeted
||/ NameVersion Architecture
Description
Hi Justin / Marco,
[Re: SELinux with Busybox on morty] On 17.07.19 (Wed 16:05) Justin Clacherty
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Is this something you or one of the other meta-selinux devs are able
> to help out with or is it more of an upstream question?
I'll see if I can give this a shot. :-)
>
>
Hi Joe,
Is this something you or one of the other meta-selinux devs are able to help
out with or is it more of an upstream question?
Cheers,
Justin.
> On 17 Jul 2017, at 4:57 pm, Marco Ostini wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> At the moment I'm attempting to prepare a VM of morty
Hi All,
At the moment I'm attempting to prepare a VM of morty with SELinux running
well in enforcing mode. Once bedded down this will be running on an
embedded system.
We use Busybox to keep the environment slim.
As you may be aware the file contexts
of