Hi Alex,
Sure. I am hoping the management see the benefits and we could start
working on this. Besides that, I should give them an estimate on how
long would it take implement such thing.
I am clueless about how much effort would it take to add a Win32
MACHINE type. By looking at conf/machine/x86
On 03/14/2018 09:56 AM, Isaac Nickaein wrote:
Thanks for sharing your experience. It is relieving to see that you
have the same perspective.
I hope there will be an initiative to target Windows and I will be
glad to contribute.
I don't think waiting for the initiative to happen will get you
an
Hi Florian,
> The SDKs and images are very helpful for (cross platform) CI and deployment.
Indeed. I don't know any platform or tool as capable as Yocto to
provide such convenience for C++ development.
> A real Windows SDK support would be awesome (exspecially for deploying
> library dependencie
Hi Isaac,
here we also have a mixture of embedded and desktop applications. We use
yocto for our embedded devices (Xilinx Zynq, Raspberry Pi, Gumstix).
The SDKs and images are very helpful for (cross platform) CI and deployment.
A first milestone definitly would be having a minimal platform s
I know the idea is wild and possibly not a top priority (or even
priority) of the community, but extending the area of Yocto to support
Windows platform can make it the ubiquitous build system for the
enterprise, especially in embedded companies that have a mixture of
embedded and desktop applicati
