Scott,
That's great. The dev manual is very comprehensive and at the right level
of detail. I think many new as well as more experienced users of YP will
appreciate it. From a quick read the only suggestion I have for now is to
place the section on Customizing Images before the section on Adding
Rudi,
Thanks for taking the time to look this stuff over. I will place customizing
images ahead of adding packages in the dev manual.
I will dig into the other issues and see what I can get in the way of
information from the development team.
Scott
From: rstr...@linuxfoundation.org
still clawing my way through the ref manual and it seems that
there's *way* too much coverage of licensing sprinkled throughout.
most people are not going to care about licensing until the time comes
to maybe start distributing their BSP.
as it stands, in the *development* version of the ref
Is BSP licensing different than non-BSP licensing? If not, then licensing
could be combined into a single section. Can someone answer this for me?
Also, good point on the BSP guide appearing as a chapter in the reference
manual. I have not liked this. Is there any rational reason to have it
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:26 +, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
Is BSP licensing different than non-BSP licensing? If not, then licensing
could be combined into a single section. Can someone answer this for me?
The focus of those sections are different and should probably be in
separate
there's *way* too much coverage of licensing sprinkled throughout.
most people are not going to care about licensing until the time comes
to maybe start distributing their BSP.
The ability of collecting licensing information, tracking license changes
and providing the license information
Rudi,
I would like you to examine the latest documents (the ones under
development). I have added some new licensing information and would like your
feedback for this upcoming version. There are licensing discussions in both
the latest versions of the BSP Guide and the reference manual.
Scott,
**
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html
.
** **
Yes, I looked at that one but I now noticed that I referenced it
incorrectly. This is the latest version, however, in the revision history
it shows Revision 1.1, October 6, 2011, Released
Rudi,
Great comments! Thanks very much. I will immediately update the revision
history tables to show the 1.2 release as WIP. Not having it there did cause
you confusion. Good suggestion.
Regarding your other observations. If you have the time I would appreciate you
looking at the YP
