On Saturday 02 November 2013 05:14:10 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i figure the answer is obvious but i'll ask it anyway -- is it
reasonable to encourage new developers to use the general packagename
variables such as PN and BPN rather than hardcoding packagenames in
their recipe files?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
gst-va-intel.bb:ALLOW_EMPTY_gst-va-intel = 1
gst-va-intel.bb:ALLOW_EMPTY_gst-va-intel-general = 1
gst-va-intel.bb:ALLOW_EMPTY_gst-va-intel-video = 1
gst-va-intel.bb:ALLOW_EMPTY_gst-va-intel-vaapi = 1
i'm *assuming*
i figure the answer is obvious but i'll ask it anyway -- is it
reasonable to encourage new developers to use the general packagename
variables such as PN and BPN rather than hardcoding packagenames in
their recipe files?
typically, you see things like this in recipe files:
ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}