On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 05:46 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Darren Hart wrote:
On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
a couple
Agreed that BitBake is the correct spelling. I will be sure to make a sweep
through our Yocto manuals and make sure that when we are referring to the tool
and not indicating the command they say BitBake.
Thanks,
ScottR
-Original Message-
From: Richard Purdie
just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling
Bitbake or BitBake since the doc source seems to bounce back and
forth and it really should be consistent.
and second, this just doesn't seem right as semantic
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling
Bitbake or BitBake since the doc source seems to bounce back and
forth and it really should be
