Re: [yocto] nodejs npm qemux86_64

2019-11-08 Thread Gmail
Great! /Jonas Andersson > 8 nov. 2019 kl. 10:59 skrev Jean-Marie LEMETAYER > : > > Actually I just update my patchset to use ${nonarch_libdir} instead of > ${libdir}. > > This will be on the next patchset version. > > For your information you can check the meta/conf/bitbake.conf file for

Re: [yocto] nodejs npm qemux86_64

2019-11-08 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
Actually I just update my patchset to use ${nonarch_libdir} instead of ${libdir}. This will be on the next patchset version. For your information you can check the meta/conf/bitbake.conf file for others target filesystem paths. Best regards, Jean-Marie On Nov 8, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Jean-Marie

Re: [yocto] nodejs npm qemux86_64

2019-11-08 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
Hi Jonas, I am currently refactoring / updating the npm handling in Yocto: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2019-October/288352.html http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2019-October/020449.html Your point is very interesting, I will take it into account

[yocto] nodejs npm qemux86_64

2019-11-07 Thread Jonas Andersson
Hi, I have installation problems for npm recipes. Using Yocto thud and machine=qemux86_64(wrlinux-x), but as I can see it this concerns all use of npm.bbclass for 64-bits system. The problem seems to be the use of ${libdir} in npm.bbclass, when 64 bit is used this expands to lib64. npm install