On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
>> In this
>> instance we can change it very easily in the BitBake help text and we should
>> do so.
>
> So should I send in a patch against the Yocto Project's
> poky/bitbake/bin/bit
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> In this
> instance we can change it very easily in the BitBake help text and we should
> do so.
So should I send in a patch against the Yocto Project's
poky/bitbake/bin/bitbake or try to have it accepted upstream?
___
On Wednesday 22 August 2012 13:05:15 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> to discover the list of available recipes (for a given set of layers)
> one can use:
> $ bitbake -s
>
> However:
>
> $ bitbake --help | grep -- -s
> ...
> -s, --show-versions show current and preferred versions of all packages
> ...
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:27 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Chris Larson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:
On 08/22/2012 01:27 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Chris Larson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Trevor Woerner
wrote:
> "bitbake -s" d
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Trevor Woerner
> >> wrote:
> >>> "bitbake -s" doesn't list "net-snmp-dbg net-snmp-doc net-snmp-dev..
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>>> "bitbake -s" doesn't list "net-snmp-dbg net-snmp-doc net-snmp-dev..."
>>> it lists "net-snmp". Therefore couldn't the wordi
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> "bitbake -s" doesn't list "net-snmp-dbg net-snmp-doc net-snmp-dev..."
>> it lists "net-snmp". Therefore couldn't the wording of the bitbake
>> help be improved to say:
>>
>> -s, --sho
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>> In this case, bitbake is looking for the expiration dates on your
>> ingredients - the version of the package that each recipe builds.
>
> But your wording would seem to imply _a_
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your tasty metaphors!
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> In this case, bitbake is looking for the expiration dates on your
> ingredients - the version of the package that each recipe builds.
But your wording would seem to imply _a_ recipe builds _a_ p
I tend to think of packages as "ingredients", in keeping with the
cooking metaphor. They have version numbers, just as ingredients in
the refrigerator have expiration dates. The recipes, however, have
their own version numbers, but they are less critical to the success
of the build - maybe my Aunt
Okay, if the confusion over "yocto" versus "yocto project" versus
"poky" and trying to decide whether poky or yocto is a distribution or
a build system or sometimes both or neither of either wasn't bad
enough... there now comes a new confusion:
recipes versus packages
an image is composed of pack
12 matches
Mail list logo
