On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote:
Some serious magic! It took me a while to reload my cache on this one.
All strapped in because here we go!
So you have selected the types of images you want to build by add
it's type to IMAGE_FSTYPES, of which you can have multiple types.
a minor
On 12/13/2012 05:03 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote:
Some serious magic! It took me a while to reload my cache on this one.
All strapped in because here we go!
So you have selected the types of images you want to build by add
it's type to IMAGE_FSTYPES, of
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote:
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/routerstationpro.conf:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= jffs2
tar.bz2
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/atom-pc.conf:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= ext3 cpio.gz
live
I would think that += would be better here, I would welcome a patch!
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi,
Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_image) still
supported? From this:
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/4671/
it would appear not. However
poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/machine/example.conf contains
Hi Darren,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_image) still
supported?
Interesting, I haven't tried myself. Have you tried and run into an issue?
Yes. I
On 12/12/2012 12:14 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi Darren,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_image) still
supported?
Interesting, I haven't tried
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi Darren,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_image) still
supported?
Interesting, I haven't tried myself.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
What is the reason you would like to do this just for vmdk? Is it to
avoid increasing the size of all the images when it is only vmdk you
care about? That would makes sense.
Yes, that's it exactly. I have an existing
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above?
When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions:
- an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff
- the ext{3,4} partition of your root image
When it
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
wrote:
so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above?
When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions:
- an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff
-
Hi Robert,
(we met at OLS last summer, I came and chatted with you briefly after
your presentation)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
now i'm interested, so ... what are your config steps? i wouldn't
mind trying to reproduce this on my system.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi Robert,
(we met at OLS last summer, I came and chatted with you briefly after
your presentation)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
wrote:
now i'm interested, so ... what are your config steps? i
On 12/12/2012 03:16 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above?
When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions:
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
