Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote: > > meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/routerstationpro.conf:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "jffs2 > > tar.bz2" > > meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/atom-pc.conf:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "ext3 cpio.gz > > live" > I would think that += would be better here, I would welcome a patch! > > > scrip

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-13 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/13/2012 05:03 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote: Some serious magic! It took me a while to reload my cache on this one. All strapped in because here we go! So you have selected the types of images you want to build by add it's type to IMAGE_FSTYPES, of wh

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-13 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Saul Wold wrote: > Some serious magic! It took me a while to reload my cache on this one. > > All strapped in because here we go! > > So you have selected the types of images you want to build by add > it's type to IMAGE_FSTYPES, of which you can have multiple types. a min

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/12/2012 03:16 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above? When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions: - an MSDOS partition for

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi Robert, > > (we met at OLS last summer, I came and chatted with you briefly after > your presentation) > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > now i'm interested, so ... what are your config steps? i wouldn't > > mind

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above? > > When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions: > - an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff > - the ext{3,4} pa

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Robert, (we met at OLS last summer, I came and chatted with you briefly after your presentation) On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > now i'm interested, so ... what are your config steps? i wouldn't > mind trying to reproduce this on my system. My doodle layer can

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above? > > When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions: > - an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff > - the ext{3,4} pa

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above? When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions: - an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff - the ext{3,4} partition of your root image When it then shmushes these tw

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > What is the reason you would like to do this just for vmdk? Is it to > avoid increasing the size of all the images when it is only vmdk you > care about? That would makes sense. Yes, that's it exactly. I have an existing build system in place

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi Darren, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still > >> supported? > > Interesting, I haven't tried myself. Have you tried

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Darren Hart
On 12/12/2012 12:14 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi Darren, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >>> Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still >>> supported? >> Interesting, I haven't tried myself. Have you trie

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Darren, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >> Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still >> supported? > Interesting, I haven't tried myself. Have you tried and run into an issue? Yes. I had been trying to figur

Re: [yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-12 Thread Darren Hart
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi, > > Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still > supported? From this: > > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/4671/ > > it would appear not. However > poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/machine/example.conf contains > IMAGE_R

[yocto] per-image ROOTFS sizes

2012-12-11 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi, Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_) still supported? From this: http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/4671/ it would appear not. However poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/machine/example.conf contains IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_ext3 (which would make it appear as though they are). Be