Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-05 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 04/03/12 21:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in oe-core don't work for meta-ti? i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and havi

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:38:36PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions > > in oe-core don't work for meta-ti? > > i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a > beagleboa

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions > in oe-core don't work for meta-ti? i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and having only to set a preferred version for udev.

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > One of the issues: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000491.html > > I haven't tried if either 3.0 or a pending 3.1 update for Panda > (from omapzoom/ti-ubuntu), resolve this gcc-4.6 build issue. But > either way I bel

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:45:01PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >>On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> > >>>On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > not su

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Brian Hutchinson
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in > oe-core don't work for meta-ti? I'd like to know this myself because I need to build 64bit & 32bit toolchains (meta-toolchain) and currently I can only get both to build

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build for, say, beagleboard with the m

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > > > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build > > > >

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build > > > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build > > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti > > into my yocto tree, added that layer to bblayers.conf, and tried >

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 4 mrt. 2012, om 13:54 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > > ... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ... > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ... On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build > > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti > > into my yoc

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing. Today, we know there is code that do

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: > > >We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing. > > >Today, we know there is code that does not work with GCC 4.6. > > >Tod

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-03 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: > >We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing. > >Today, we know there is code that does not work with GCC 4.6. > >Today, we know there are features in the recipes that do no

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-03 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:22:30PM -0500, William Mills wrote: > > > On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > >>Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread William Mills
On 03/02/2012 06:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt language :) (patched two days ag

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote: On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt language :) (patched two days ago). Denys: I suggest change: "Due to the ab

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread William Mills
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt language :) (patched two days ago). Denys: I suggest change: "Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the in

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote: ... snip ... > Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt > language :) (patched two days ago). > > Denys: I suggest > > change: > > "Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the instructions > at http://www.angstrom-dist

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread William Mills
On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the yocto consolidate

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 2 mrt. 2012, om 17:45 heeft Stewart, David C het volgende geschreven: >> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi >> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM >> >> Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasi

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stewart, David C wrote: > >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi > >Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM > > > >Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing > >seems > >to suggest you

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Stewart, David C
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi >Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM > >Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing seems >to suggest you are confusing 'yocto' with 'poky', which is a common mistake

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-03-02 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 23:28 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> >> Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> It is true that the beagleboard is a h

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > >> It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the > >> yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto laye

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-28 4:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means that it gets the yocto standard QA builds and boot testing. That being s

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the >> yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means >> that it gets the yocto standard

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the > yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means > that it gets the yocto standard QA builds and boot testing. > > That being said, if you are looking for the latest

Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-02-28 01:51 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i asked this on the beagle list, and koen pointed out that it was probably more appropriate elsewhere (probably here). what's the proper algorithm for building the leading-edge images for a beagle xM (rev C)? i realize there's canonical suppo

[yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

2012-02-28 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i asked this on the beagle list, and koen pointed out that it was probably more appropriate elsewhere (probably here). what's the proper algorithm for building the leading-edge images for a beagle xM (rev C)? i realize there's canonical support in a yocto tree for the beagleboard xM, but koe