On 04/03/12 21:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions
in oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a
beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and havi
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:38:36PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions
> > in oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
>
> i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a
> beagleboa
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions
> in oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a
beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and having only to set a
preferred version for udev.
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> One of the issues:
>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000491.html
>
> I haven't tried if either 3.0 or a pending 3.1 update for Panda
> (from omapzoom/ti-ubuntu), resolve this gcc-4.6 build issue. But
> either way I bel
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:45:01PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> not su
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in
> oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
I'd like to know this myself because I need to build 64bit & 32bit
toolchains (meta-toolchain) and currently I can only get both to build
On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
for, say, beagleboard with the m
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
> > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > > >
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti
> > into my yocto tree, added that layer to bblayers.conf, and tried
>
Op 4 mrt. 2012, om 13:54 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
>
> ... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ...
>
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>> not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ...
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti
> > into my yoc
On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing.
Today, we know there is code that do
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
> > >We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing.
> > >Today, we know there is code that does not work with GCC 4.6.
> > >Tod
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
> >We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing.
> >Today, we know there is code that does not work with GCC 4.6.
> >Today, we know there are features in the recipes that do no
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:22:30PM -0500, William Mills wrote:
>
>
> On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >
> >>Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>
On 03/02/2012 06:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ag
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ago).
Denys: I suggest
change:
"Due to the ab
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ago).
Denys: I suggest
change:
"Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the in
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
> Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
> language :) (patched two days ago).
>
> Denys: I suggest
>
> change:
>
> "Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the instructions
> at http://www.angstrom-dist
On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
yocto consolidate
Op 2 mrt. 2012, om 17:45 heeft Stewart, David C het volgende geschreven:
>> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
>> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
>>
>> Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasi
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stewart, David C wrote:
> >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
> >Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
> >
> >Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing
> >seems
> >to suggest you
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
>
>Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing seems
>to suggest you are confusing 'yocto' with 'poky', which is a common mistake
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 23:28 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>>
>> Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>
It is true that the beagleboard is a h
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> >> It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
> >> yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto laye
On 12-02-28 4:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means
that it gets the yocto standard QA builds and boot testing.
That being s
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>> It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
>> yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means
>> that it gets the yocto standard
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
> yocto consolidated kernel tree and meta-yocto layers. That means
> that it gets the yocto standard QA builds and boot testing.
>
> That being said, if you are looking for the latest
On 12-02-28 01:51 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i asked this on the beagle list, and koen pointed out that it was
probably more appropriate elsewhere (probably here). what's the
proper algorithm for building the leading-edge images for a beagle xM
(rev C)?
i realize there's canonical suppo
i asked this on the beagle list, and koen pointed out that it was
probably more appropriate elsewhere (probably here). what's the
proper algorithm for building the leading-edge images for a beagle xM
(rev C)?
i realize there's canonical support in a yocto tree for the
beagleboard xM, but koe
31 matches
Mail list logo
