Zhang, Jessica wrote on 2011-01-17:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves
>>> differently on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup
>>> perspective. It never e
Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently
>> on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It
>> never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently
> on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It
> never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for 64bit users but
> for 32bit
Hi Richard,
As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently on
64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It never
enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for 64bit users but for 32bit
user, if you leave SDKMACHINE unset, the bitbake sanity test will fa