Re: [yocto] question about SDKMACHINE, SDK_ARCH and BUILD_ARCH

2011-01-17 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Zhang, Jessica wrote on 2011-01-17: > Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote: >>> Hi Richard, >>> >>> As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves >>> differently on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup >>> perspective. It never e

Re: [yocto] question about SDKMACHINE, SDK_ARCH and BUILD_ARCH

2011-01-16 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently >> on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It >> never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for

Re: [yocto] question about SDKMACHINE, SDK_ARCH and BUILD_ARCH

2011-01-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 15:36 -0800, Zhang, Jessica wrote: > Hi Richard, > > As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently > on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It > never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for 64bit users but > for 32bit

[yocto] question about SDKMACHINE, SDK_ARCH and BUILD_ARCH

2011-01-13 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi Richard, As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf for 64bit users but for 32bit user, if you leave SDKMACHINE unset, the bitbake sanity test will fa