Re: [yocto] why does meta-intel crownbay-noemgd.conf not require "meta-intel"?

2013-10-11 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 05:49 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > perusing sample machine conf files and BSP definitions, looking for > > nice examples to use in a class in a couple weeks, and i noticed the > > following oddity under meta-intel/meta-crownbay.

Re: [yocto] why does meta-intel crownbay-noemgd.conf not require "meta-intel"?

2013-10-11 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 05:49 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > perusing sample machine conf files and BSP definitions, looking for > nice examples to use in a class in a couple weeks, and i noticed the > following oddity under meta-intel/meta-crownbay. > > while crownbay.conf contains: > > requir

[yocto] why does meta-intel crownbay-noemgd.conf not require "meta-intel"?

2013-10-11 Thread Robert P. J. Day
perusing sample machine conf files and BSP definitions, looking for nice examples to use in a class in a couple weeks, and i noticed the following oddity under meta-intel/meta-crownbay. while crownbay.conf contains: require conf/machine/include/tune-atom.inc require conf/machine/include/ia32