On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sunday 17 November 2013 11:17:13 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Chris Larson wrote:
> >
> > ... huge snip that i hope won't be necessary ...
> >
> > > This test you did makes no sense. Of course it’s in IMAGE_FEATURES,
Hi Robert,
On Sunday 17 November 2013 11:17:13 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> ... huge snip that i hope won't be necessary ...
>
> > This test you did makes no sense. Of course it’s in IMAGE_FEATURES,
> > you put it there. What you didn’t check is whether
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> $ bb show -r core-image-base ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE
> Parsing recipes..done.
> # ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE=opkg opkg-collateral ${EXTRAOPKGCONFIG}
> ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE="opkg opkg-coll
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> $ bb show -r core-image-base ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE
> Parsing recipes..done.
> # ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE=opkg opkg-collateral ${EXTRAOPKGCONFIG}
> ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE="opkg opkg-collateral poky-feed-config-opkg"
> $
>
> but that feature *also* pulls in ad
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Chris Larson wrote:
... huge snip that i hope won't be necessary ...
> This test you did makes no sense. Of course it’s in IMAGE_FEATURES,
> you put it there. What you didn’t check is whether
> ${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE} ended up being installed in the image, which it
> won’t be.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> leaving aside the bug report, i am now hopelessly confused. are you
> saying this line:
>
> PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
>
> from core-i
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> leaving aside the bug report, i am now hopelessly confused. are you
> saying this line:
>
> PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
>
> from core-image.bbclass is currently *necessary* to properly support
> the image fea
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Sunday 17 November 2013 06:30:01 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Sunday 17 November 2013 04:19:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > think i may have asked this once upon a time, but why, in
> > > >
> > >
On Sunday 17 November 2013 06:30:01 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 November 2013 04:19:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > think i may have asked this once upon a time, but why, in
> > >
> > > core-image.bbclass, is there the line:
> > > PACKA
Hi Robert,
On Sunday 17 November 2013 04:19:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> think i may have asked this once upon a time, but why, in
> core-image.bbclass, is there the line:
>
> PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
>
> as i read it, package-management doesn't represent an a
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sunday 17 November 2013 04:19:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > think i may have asked this once upon a time, but why, in
> > core-image.bbclass, is there the line:
> >
> > PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
> >
>
think i may have asked this once upon a time, but why, in
core-image.bbclass, is there the line:
PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management = "${ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE}"
as i read it, package-management doesn't represent an actual package
group, but rather represents one of a number of IMAGE_FEATURES that
a
12 matches
Mail list logo
