On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Moving the Cedartrail PVR specific kernel
features to the meta area and removing
them from the BSP.
Looks fine to me. I won't be near a real computer for another day or so, but
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset implements a new BSP for the 'Chief River' platform, which
consists of the Intel Ivy Bridge processor and Panther Point PCH. It
assumes that the Ivy Bridge integrated graphics
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 17:26 -0300, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset implements a new BSP for the 'Chief River
toolchain( we use CodeSourcery)?.
Best Regards,
Om Prakash Pal
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 6:00 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Richard Purdie
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting
On 12-05-25 05:48 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset implements the initial kernel side of the chiefriver
BSP.
It also adds a 'temporary' feature needed for turning on rc6 support
from recipe-space. The code contained in the rc6 feature is
On 12-05-25 06:20 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 49f931bc294d5b6be60502bbd448cff5aa766235:
meta/fishriver: remove redundant features and options (2012-05-14 17:10:36
-0500)
The series looks good to me. As I mentioned in Tom's pull request, there's
a slight
On 12-05-25 01:44 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Add Power Management and move kernel features to
Cedartrail Machine branch.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta.
Looks good. I've got this associated with Tom and Darren's updates,
so it
On 12-05-25 5:48 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset implements the initial kernel side of the chiefriver
BSP.
It also adds a 'temporary' feature needed for turning on rc6 support
from recipe-space. The code contained in the rc6 feature is
On 12-05-25 6:20 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The following changes since commit 49f931bc294d5b6be60502bbd448cff5aa766235:
meta/fishriver: remove redundant features and options (2012-05-14 17:10:36
-0500)
are available in the git repository at:
On 12-05-25 1:44 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Add Power Management and move kernel features to
Cedartrail Machine branch.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta.
Merged and pushed to the linux-yocto-3.0 tree (on top of 3.0.32).
Bruce
On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote:
The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback
now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently
disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and
On 12-06-01 01:43 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/31/2012 08:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote:
The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback
now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org
On 12-06-11 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These patches are already part of v3.4 kernel sources. So there is no need to
maintain them in the yocto linux 3.4 repository.
dropped. They obviously weren't reference anyway.
I assume you'll
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:20 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] remove
..
Cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ryan Julian ryanjul...@berkeley.edu
wrote:
Tomas Frydrych tf+lists.yocto@... writes:
This is a different issue. I get this too with one particular MMC card
On 12-06-13 04:44 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
Hi,
My current test hardware for Yocto work is a Celeron-class Sandy Bridge-based micro PC.
As is to be expected for a machine like this, it's got modern Intel graphics and
wireless. Neither of which are supported by atom-pc, as it's nominally a
On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote:
Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this
machine as well.
And x32… :)
From the kernel point of view, these are just configuration extensions
to a base, which is where
On 12-06-13 05:00 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 06/13/2012 01:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote:
Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this
machine as well.
And x32
/poky-contrib zedd/libc-headers
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/libc-headers
Bruce Ashfield (2):
linux-libc-headers-yocto: use kernel-arch to set ARCH
linux-libc-headers-yocto: update to v3.4 and remove unecessary code
.../linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb
Updating the linux-libc-headers-yocto recipe to 3.4. There are blocks
of code and definitions that are handled by the included libc-headers.inc,
so we shouldn't be repeating them in this recipe.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
---
.../linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb
The arch mapping done in kernel-arch should be used instead of
recipe local mapping. Inheriting kernel-arch consolidates the
code and simplifies the libc-header recipe.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
---
.../linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb| 17
On 12-06-25 08:53 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote:
Hi Khem,
I have build core-image-core. but still this Error:
==
11.165466] EXT3-fs (mmcblk0p1): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode
[ 11.172668] VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on
it.
Cheers,
Bruce
Best Regards,
Om Prakash Pal
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:38 PM
To: Om Prakash PAL
Cc: Khem Raj; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Porting of specific Kernel/Driver into yocto
On 12-06-26 07:08 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
Hello @all,
as part of my bachelor thesis, I'm in the process of creating a custom
Linux OS
for the taskit Stamp9G20
http://www.taskit.de/en/products/stamp9g20/index.htm (a small
AT91SAM9G20 based CPU board). This is when
I came across the YoctoProject.
On 12-06-26 09:49 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 12-06-26 07:08 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
AT91SAM9G20 based CPU board). This is when I came across the YoctoProject.
Now I'm trying to build a BSP Layer
On 12-06-26 10:52 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
In the example in The Developement Manual v1.2 in Appendix B Section
B.1.7, it states that you need to put in the statement:
KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2 ?=/home/scottrif/linux-yocto-3.2.git
into the appropriate .bbappend file way now in the poky-extra
may not be noticed, or may be less obvious when you look
at the recipes-kernel as a whole.
Cheers,
Bruce
Scott
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:54 AM
-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:54 AM
To: jfabernathy
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
On 12-06-26 10:52 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
In the example in The Developement Manual v1.2 in Appendix
On 12-06-26 12:11 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 06/26/2012 12:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-06-26 12:00 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 06/26/2012 10:56 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
Bruce,
Should the example note this? Would it be best to specifically say to
uncomment that SRC_URI line?
Scott
Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:24 AM
To: jfabernathy
Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
On 12-06-26 12:11 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 06/26/2012 12:04
AM
To: Bruce Ashfield
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
I am on task 1507 of 1606 of a minimal build (from the example). No
issues so far.
So now that Denzil has a branch in poky-extra, the only doc change is to
add the checkout
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Dennis.Yxun dennis.y...@gmail.com wrote:
HI ALL:
Sorry for crossing post, but I'm quite new here, so if I did
something wrong, please point me the right direction. thanks
I'm using
On 12-06-27 02:25 AM, Dennis.Yxun wrote:
HI ALL:
Sorry for crossing post, but I'm quite new here, so if I did
something wrong, please point me the right direction. thanks
I'm using oe-core, and notice that mipsel support(o32, little
endian mode) is missing (current available choose is:
On 12-06-29 09:34 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
Hello @all,
now I have a working BSP-Layer, but for now its only a plain copy
(created with yocto-bsp)
of arm-versatile-926ejs. And the only thing it does so far, is
creating a .config-Kernel
configuration file (which is fine by now). To adapt this to
On 12-06-29 11:08 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 12-06-29 09:34 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
I guess the config variables inside features_not_found.txt are the one
I need to include into
the stamp9g20.cfg, stamp9g20
On 12-06-29 01:19 PM, Markus Hubig wrote:
Hello @all, hello Bruce!
https://bitbucket.org/imko/meta-stamp9g20
here you can find my first attempt of a BSP for the taskit stamp9g20 and
portuxg20 Board. Until now there is only the kernel part. Please have a look
and give comments.
I had a look,
that you verified everything happily builds with and
without the perf-scripting being available ?
Cheers,
Bruce
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4 standard/base.
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit a8291fa6f723b0182d2b7033b5d59f412ba7cf72:
Bruce Ashfield (1):
yaffs2
On 12-07-03 02:08 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset enables FTRACE_SYSCALLS, used by some existing perf scripts.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4.
A reasonable addition, I can think of when we'd not want this enabled
by default. I'll add
On 12-07-03 02:09 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset comprises the kernel side of the modifications needed to
enable the Perl and Python bindings for perf scripting.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.2 standard/base.
Ack'd. Same as the 3.4
On 12-07-14 9:23 AM, Edward Vidal wrote:
Hello,
git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky.git
http://git.yoctoproject.org/poky.git
cd poky
. oe-init-build-env
MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake -v core-image-sato
Hmmm. And here I was just thinking that things had been quiet on this
front and it was
On 12-07-16 10:22 AM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named emgd-1.14, so
that it can be merged with various bsp specific branches as needed.
On 12-07-17 10:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-07-16 10:22 AM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named emgd-1.14, so
that it can be merged
On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi,
I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
installed but not shipped in any package:
WARNING: /etc
ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did
On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux
On 12-07-17 8:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Edward Vidal vidal.devel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Close to the USB I see a C and close to speaker XM I am assuming the This is
XM-C
What would be the process to use
3.4.x kernel and a mainline u-boot.
I am new to poky and don't know much about bit bake and
On 12-07-18 10:13 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 22:57 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This commit changes emgd kernel driver for crownbay bsp to the emgd-1.14.
Nitin,
Doesn't switching this over in the kenrnel require
On 12-07-18 7:12 PM, Edward Vidal wrote:
Hello,
I tried the suggestion to try the 3.4 kernel. I didn't get the 3.4
kernel instead I got the 3.2 kernel and the boot process went much
further this time.
Progress is good. You ended up with the 3.2 kernel because the
On 12-07-19 11:25 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zanussi, Tom
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:27 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/1] meta: update crownbay.scc for newer emgd driver
On Thu,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 15:01 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Zanussi
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012
On 12-07-21 11:58 AM, Edward Vidal wrote:
hello,
verifing that this is ver poky-1.2.1
The post by Elizabeth Flanagan Wed Jul 18 14:20:41 PDT 2012
Yocto 1.2.1 Released
Flanagan, Elizabeth elizabeth.flanagan at intel.com http://intel.com
Commit Information:
Tree/Branch: denzil
Commit id:
On 12-07-26 02:37 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
I get the following error:
ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
kernel config when you were working
on the BSP, it may have build a default 32 bit, and that could cause the
QA error.
Cheers,
Bruce
Rahul
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:45 AM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: yocto
, and that could cause the QA error.
Cheers,
Bruce
Rahul
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:45 AM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I finally managed to find time to pick up porting my project to denzil and
did encounter two issues that I wanted to report back:
First is that I could not find what the preferred way was to
On 12-07-28 09:45 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
From: Leon Woestenbergl...@sidebranch.com
Signed-off-by: Leon Woestenbergl...@sidebranch.com
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
On 12-07-30 10:20 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your support.
See below
2012/7/30 Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com mailto:fransmeulenbro
On 12-07-30 10:20 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your support.
See below
2012/7/30 Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com mailto:fransmeulenbro
On 12-08-02 02:35 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
This is a revised patch set is for creating the new Crystal Forest Machine.
Crystal Forest Machine is Sandybridge CPU with Cave Creek Chipset.
This machine is based on
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Markus Hubig mhu...@imko.de wrote:
Hi @all,
I'm having some trouble building a BSP supporting two different machines.
The machines in question are the Stamp9g20 and PortuxG20 from taskit. These
machines are just slightly different course the PortuxG20 is
On 12-08-09 10:48 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
In my local.conf I have set the following variable
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = linux-libc-headers_3.3
Have you tried dropping the linux-libc-headers ?
i.e. PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = 3.3
Bruce
However, when I run
On 12-08-09 10:55 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:50 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-08-09 10:48 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
In my local.conf I have set the following variable
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = linux-libc-headers_3.3
Have you tried dropping
On 12-08-09 02:14 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
HI,
On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
In my experience .. it is always just the version, not the package that
you want to specify, so from all of those, you'd drop the gcc_ .. etc,
from the string.
Bruce
PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc
On 12-08-09 5:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussitom.zanu...@intel.com
This patchset fixes yocto bugs [YOCTO #2693] and [YOCTO #2587], and
fixes some other minor usability problems reported by users.
Please pull into the current poky/denzil point release branch.
v2: This is
On 12-08-13 9:50 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
From: Trevor Woernertwoer...@gmail.com
The recipes are no longer stored in a packages directory but in directories
under recipes-*.
I grabbed this and pushed it to the poky-extras repo.
Thanks!
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Trevor
On 12-08-17 5:33 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com writes:
On 12-08-17 04:21 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining a BSP based on crownbay and I would like to change my
current kernel recipe from a custom one to linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
I'm just heading
On 12-08-22 05:28 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
We end up with linking errors on arm using latest binutils
because we are linking asm generated objects which use -march=all
generating different attributes into object and use some c objects
e.g. misc.o which use different march therefore generating a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Hartmut Behrens
hartmut.behr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully created an image for a Gumstix Overo using the BSP layer
available at https://github.com/squirly/meta-gumstix
The MACHINE variable is set to overo in the build/conf/local.conf file.
I
On 12-08-23 09:24 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
Hello @all,
because I need the commit 'dcadeda' I switched from denzil to 1.3_M3.
Now I get a strage error while do_kernel_config:
| configme --reconfig --output.../linux-portuxg20-standard-build standard
stamp9g20
| [INFO] Configuring target/machine
On 12-08-23 01:28 PM, Markus Hubig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:26:30PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-08-23 12:18 PM, Markus Hubig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:31:15AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-08-23 09:24 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
snipp
Surprisingly if I remove
On 12-08-21 01:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 08/20/2012 09:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Back to this .. I've been buried in other items until now.
+Kernel types (ktypes) are the highest level policy containers and represent
+a significant set of kernel functionality that has been grouped
On 12-08-22 04:22 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
I haven't looked yet, will 3.4+ need the same fix ?
yes looking at 3.4 code. But havent tried that yet
I've merged this to the 3.2 tree and the 3.4 tree. I haven't
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Darren Hart darren.h...@intel.com wrote:
On 08/27/2012 08:18 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-08-27 8:14 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Hi,
I am building a BSP (meta-cedartrail) using 1.3 M3 branch of Poky.
When I try to boot a image such as core-image-sato, I get
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Saxena, Rahul rahul.sax...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to apply a kernel patch from the BSP, but getting a error.
DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch
Unstaged changes after reset:
M .gitignore
Deleted branch meta-temp (was 580ac9c).
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering why yocto includes a beagleboard.conf when it is unable
to support much of the board's features, and there is a dedicated layer
for TI stuff that defines the beagleboard machine properly.
I
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi,
On 03/09/12 21:15, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Tomas Frydrych
So we fix the configuration of the layers ..
I expect this is not actually that trivial. I think the only way to do
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
meta-yocto in this scenario ?
a) I am targeting multiple chips, including TI Omap
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Jack Mitchell m...@communistcode.co.uk wrote:
On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Tomas Frydrych
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
snip...
That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
meta
On 12-09-04 02:08 AM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 6:59 PM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren
Subject: Re: [yocto] Error when applying kernel patch from BSP
On 12-09-04 12:25 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 7:12 AM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren
Subject: Re: [yocto] Error when applying kernel
On 12-09-05 03:03 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote:
This is to prevent the HW BSP generated by the autobuild from being used in
production, it's added by the autobuilder to the HW bsps.
thats fine. However, I am using linux-yocto
On 12-09-06 5:06 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 09/06/2012 04:11 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi Elvis,
Thanks so much for taking a look at my email! I've read through lots
of this mailing list's history and noticed all your meta-xilinx work
in the past and was hoping I could pique your interest
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-06 5:06 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 09/06/2012 04:11 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Hi Elvis,
Thanks so much for taking a look at my email! I've read through lots
On 12-09-07 12:19 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 08:27 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Philip Balisterphi...@balister.org wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Speaking of zynq, I have a simple BSP here for the zc702 board
On 12-09-07 01:29 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 09/07/2012 12:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-07 12:19 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 08:27 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Philip Balisterphi...@balister.org
wrote:
On 09/06/2012 06:19 PM
On 12-09-16 12:49 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 15, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
I just noticed that with the recent poky master updates, my
images/modules-3.3.1-r00-virtex5.tgz file has grown from 33.1 MB to 668.5MB.
When I looked in the package, I saw that the kernel/drivers
On 12-09-18 01:59 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0, meta.
Adding linux-yocto, Darren and Tom.
This looks fine to me, and we should consider it for all the repositories,
not just 3.0.
Tom/Darren. Any side effects you can think of for this change ?
Bruce
Added
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:21 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 01:59 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0, meta.
Adding linux-yocto, Darren and Tom.
This looks fine to me, and we should
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Mihai Lindner
mihaix.lind...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 2012-09-18 16:49, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:21 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 01:59 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0, meta.
Adding linux-yocto, Darren
On 12-09-18 10:46 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 17:23, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 16:58 +0300, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 16:49, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08:21 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 01:59 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
Please pull
On 12-09-19 11:56 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 18:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 10:46 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 17:23, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 16:58 +0300, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 16:49, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 08
On 12-09-19 03:39 PM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 22:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 11:56 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 18:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 10:46 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 17:23, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 16:58 +0300
On 12-09-19 04:22 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 03:39 PM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 22:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 11:56 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 18:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-18 10:46 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-18 17:23, Tom Zanussi
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Marc Ferland ferla...@sonatest.com wrote:
Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com writes:
On 09/19/2012 01:53 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com writes:
On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to create a live system
On 12-09-19 04:54 PM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 23:32, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 04:22 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 03:39 PM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 22:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-19 11:56 AM, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On 2012-09-19 18:43, Bruce
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
On 7 Oct 2012, at 03:00, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Try adding the unionfs feature (below) to your kernel:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.0/tree/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/unionfs?h=meta
create
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
On 7 Oct 2012, at 22:41, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
On 7 Oct 2012, at 03:00, Saxena, Rahul wrote:
Try adding the unionfs feature (below) to your
On 13-06-27 08:50 AM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:24 AM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel patch is unpacked but not applied
On 13-06-26 11:42 PM
On 13-06-27 08:50 AM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:24 AM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel patch is unpacked but not applied
On 13-06-26 11:42 PM
On 13-06-27 08:50 AM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:24 AM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel patch is unpacked but not applied
On 13-06-26 11:42 PM
501 - 600 of 2361 matches
Mail list logo
