On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:55:38PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:39 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 20:37 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> > > There is a couple of plugins for handling kernel modules in yum-utils
> > > Based on the discussion in
> > >
> > >
> "JA" == James Antill writes:
JA> and if it wasn't for the fact that Fedora reviews take 666 days
JA> I'd be happy with that.
Not fair. I know that the queue gets stuffed with tons of random
packages, but most tickets really are addressed rather quickly,
especially if they're necessary for
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:55 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> Well we needed "yum-kmod" for RHEL/CentOS 5 ... and I haven't heard
> that we won't need it for version 6.
> Obviously we could put it in a separate package, but then we could do
> that for most of yum-utils and if it wasn't for the fact t
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:39 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 20:37 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> > There is a couple of plugins for handling kernel modules in yum-utils
> > Based on the discussion in
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482893
> >
> > and others
> >
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 20:37 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> There is a couple of plugins for handling kernel modules in yum-utils
> Based on the discussion in
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482893
>
> and others
> there there some problem with the plugins and the 3 part repos
> co
There is a couple of plugins for handling kernel modules in yum-utils
Based on the discussion in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482893
and others
there there some problem with the plugins and the 3 part repos
containing kernel module packages.
So the big question is do we keep thes
