On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 10:42 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> > And you'd have to restart yum (or manage to unload and reload the rpm
> > module
> > entirely) after such update, otherwise yum would still be using the older
> > librpm.
>
> > Putting th
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote:
And you'd have to restart yum (or manage to unload and reload the rpm module
entirely) after such update, otherwise yum would still be using the older
librpm.
Putting the rpmlib() provides into regular provides of the rpm package would
be wrong as
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Seth Vidal wrote:
We've discussed putting them in the repomd.xml so you know that "this repo"
needs this set of rpm capabilities. just to avoid dumping a lot of mindless
metadata here.
but, again, the BEST CASE is that you have to
