On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> >The patch cannot have been correct, really. Either it would've
> >required other changes to TransactionWrapper class, or (perhaps
> >more likely) the change just masked away the real prob
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The patch cannot have been correct, really. Either it would've
required other changes to TransactionWrapper class, or (perhaps
more likely) the
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The patch cannot have been correct, really. Either it would've required other
changes to TransactionWrapper class, or (perhaps more likely) the change just
masked away the real problem.
I don't disagree with you - I just wanted an explanation of
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, James Antill wrote:
---
yum/rpmtrans.py |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/yum/rpmtrans.py b/yum/rpmtrans.py
index f33f048..0340153 100644
--- a/yum/rpmtrans.py
+++ b/yum/rpmtrans.py
@@ -209,7 +2
