On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:34 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > inside urlgrabber.
> > One problem here is that you need to get all the SSL configuration/etc.
> > into the helper ... and you need to get the progress info. out. Apart
> > from those though, it should be "pretty simple".
>
> Agreed - ultimat
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> We've been talking about this off and on, because for obvious reasons
> it ties into doing parallel downloads (and would be pretty cool
> anyway :).
> So here are our random thoughts (that I can remember, Seth might answer
> on Monday if I
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 22:59 +0200, Terje Røsten wrote:
> Steve Lawrence
> > A few months ago we talked about the possibility of splitting yum into
> > separate processes so that SELinux could be used to confine access.
>
> If this is done, multithreading / multiprocess should be considered to
>
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 01:49 -0700, Casey Jao wrote:
> "wouldn't it skip removing all packages that were installed due to being
> dependency of *something*, not just the chrome package?"
>
> The patch skips all packages that were installed explicitly by the user
> (and hence has a reason flag of "u
"wouldn't it skip removing all packages that were installed due to being
dependency of *something*, not just the chrome package?"
The patch skips all packages that were installed explicitly by the user
(and hence has a reason flag of "user").
"I'd also appreciate if it would list the remaining le
