Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH RFC] Add new metadata type to comps

2012-08-06 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Bill Nottingham wrote: James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said: anaconda seems greatly in favor of (from a kickstart perspective) of treating it as a new item separate from groups, with a different delimiting character. The more I think of it the less sure I am, as

Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH RFC] Add new metadata type to comps

2012-08-06 Thread Bill Nottingham
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > anaconda seems greatly in favor of (from a kickstart perspective) of > > treating it as a new item separate from groups, with a different delimiting > > character. > > The more I think of it the less sure I am, as it helps a bunch of the > UI stuf

Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH RFC] Add new metadata type to comps

2012-08-06 Thread James Antill
Sorry for not responding sooner. On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 14:47 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > > > From the backend POV, this looks fine to me (I assume the anaconda guys > > > > are happy with the APIs they need?) > > > > > > It's still being di

Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH RFC] Add new metadata type to comps

2012-08-06 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > Discussions there centered mainly around naming; the name of 'environment' > was considered better than 'install class'. Updated patch attached. > > > > > From the UI POV though I think we need to integrate it into the current > > > > groups. So you c

[Yum-devel] New DNF build: dnf-0.2.7-6.git8ac0959.fc18.

2012-08-06 Thread Ales Kozumplik
Hello, There's a new DNF rawhide build available: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=346216 The focus this time was on bringing it on par with the API changes in hawkey (simplifying the interface to Yum repositories loading). Significant changes: None Ping me if you'd like

Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH] setupSourceRepos: noop when bin repo does not exist. BZ 808339, 808347.

2012-08-06 Thread Zdenek Pavlas
> 4. Don't disable *-source, no matter what bin says, enable > corresponding *-source for enabled bins: > > ...and I think people would prefer #4 to #2 ... any other opinions? Yes, #4 seems to better match what users expect, and it also kills 3 more lines. Pushed that. ___