Re: [Yum-devel] [PATCH] ssl patches for new urlgrabber and "proper" ssl support add options matching up to the options that were implemented in the m2crypto patch to yum and urlgrabber that many folks

2009/8/14 Seth Vidal wrote: [..] > @@ -698,6 +698,12 @@ class YumConf(StartupConf): > >     color_search_match = Option('bold') > > +    sslcacert = Option() > +    sslverify = BoolOption(True) > +    sslclientcert = Option() > +    sslclientkey = Option() > + > + >     _reposlist = [] Minor - I w

Re: [Yum-devel] plugin to order downloads wrt size

odisable & yum repoenable Is this okay ? or not acceptable ? -- Regards, Rakesh Pandit ___ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

Re: [Yum-devel] plugin to order downloads wrt size

call prior to hook point .. so that I can get out of my evil implementation ? Is it acceptable ? I would like a straight yes or no ? If yes I can provide a patch. -- Regards, Rakesh Pandit ___ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http:/

Re: [Yum-devel] plugin to order downloads wrt size

2009/6/22 Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > >>>> Suggestions and comments for improvement ? >>> >>> 1. dare I ask it - what difference does it make the order the pkgs are >>> downloaded in? >>> >> &

Re: [Yum-devel] plugin to order downloads wrt size

2009/6/22 Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have written a small plugin to order downloads as per size : >> (users with variable bandwidth do find it useful) >> >> http://rakesh.fedorapeop

[Yum-devel] plugin to order downloads wrt size

at hooks can have access to them .. as evil hacks I guess wouldn't be acceptable to presto atleast. Till the time this is done, I will have to update it as soon as any change occurs in downloadPkgs function. Suggestions and comments for improvement ? Thanks, -- Regards, Rakesh Pandit ___