On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 08:33 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Attached is the patch.
Pushed.
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 10:16 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > The man page (docs/repoquery.1) has not been updated with the new
> > arguments.
>
> I will fix this
>
> > The patch adds some Dot() calls, but I don't see Dot() defined
> > anywhere.
>
> Indeed, they should be DotPlot().
>
> Sin
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 00:22 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > 0001-Update-arguments.patch
>
> Sorry for chiming in this late, but here's a few remarks about this
> patch:
>
> The man page (docs/repoquery.1) has not been updated with the new
> arguments.
I will fix this
> The patch adds some Dot() c
> 0001-Update-arguments.patch
Sorry for chiming in this late, but here's a few remarks about this patch:
The man page (docs/repoquery.1) has not been updated with the new arguments.
The patch adds some Dot() calls, but I don't see Dot() defined anywhere.
_
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:21 -0500, James Antill wrote:
>
> > > 2. There are three places where this happens:
> > >
> > > +if dot is None:
> > > +self._tree_print_req(pkg, req, level)
> > > +lim = level
> > > +else:
> > > +dot.addPackage(pkg, rpk
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 17:33 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 09:36 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> >
> > ...so we don't have the indentation change?
>
> I tried to fix this.
Looks good.
> > 2. There are three places where this happens:
> >
> > +if dot is None:
> > +
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 09:36 -0500, James Antill wrote:
>
> ...so we don't have the indentation change?
I tried to fix this.
>
> 2. There are three places where this happens:
>
> +if dot is None:
> +self._tree_print_req(pkg, req, level)
> +lim = level
> +
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 22:45 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:25 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> >
> > 1. default_header should be inside the DotPlot class.
> >
> > 2. The big == 'ascii-tree' tests should be merged a lot more, as most
> > of the code is the same. Just using dot=No
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:25 -0500, James Antill wrote:
>
> 1. default_header should be inside the DotPlot class.
>
> 2. The big == 'ascii-tree' tests should be merged a lot more, as most
> of the code is the same. Just using dot=None, and still passing
> dot=dot in the ascii-tree branch should be
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:03 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > --requires --level=# --output=ascii-tree|dot-tree
>
> There is a patch which works for
> --requires --level=[#|all] --output=[text|ascii-tree|dot-tree]
> and
> --whatrequires --le
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>
> --requires --level=# --output=ascii-tree|dot-tree
There is a patch which works for
--requires --level=[#|all] --output=[text|ascii-tree|dot-tree]
and
--whatrequires --level=[#|all] --output=[text|ascii-tree|dot-tree]
(the old --tree-requi
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > Why are these both shown in the output? Just one of them should
> be
> > > visible
> > > > (and the other one deprecated but kept around for compatibilitys
> > > sake):
> > > >--show-duplicates show all versions of packages
> > >
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:28 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:46 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > >
> > > Why are these both shown in the output? Just one of them should be
> > visible
> > > (and the other one de
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:46 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> > Why are these both shown in the output? Just one of them should be
> visible
> > (and the other one deprecated but kept around for compatibilitys
> sake):
> >--show
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Why are these both shown in the output? Just one of them should be visible
> (and the other one deprecated but kept around for compatibilitys sake):
>--show-duplicates show all versions of packages
>--show-dupes
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, seth vidal wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 00:54 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 19:09 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
How about just adding a dot output mode to repoquery? Something like
--tree-format=[tree|dot] and defaulting tree (feel free to pick a
better n
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 00:54 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 19:09 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > How about just adding a dot output mode to repoquery? Something like
> > --tree-format=[tree|dot] and defaulting tree (feel free to pick a
> > better name though :)
>
> I'd go mor
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 19:09 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> How about just adding a dot output mode to repoquery? Something like
> --tree-format=[tree|dot] and defaulting tree (feel free to pick a
> better name though :)
I'd go more for --tree-format=[asci|dot] ;-)
> The dot formatting in packa
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 18:59 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
The file can be found there:
http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/package-graph.py
Actually this version fails if tested from /usr/bin as it can not import
the class from repoquery.
Should I look to port t
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 18:59 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> The file can be found there:
> http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/package-graph.py
Actually this version fails if tested from /usr/bin as it can not import
the class from repoquery.
Should I look to port the code from repoquery to a dedicated py
Hi,
I would like to propose the following addition to the yum-utils package.
It is a small script largely inspired from the repo-graph and the
repoquery which generates a dot file for the command --tree-requires and
--tree-whatrequires (at the moment).
I tried to keep the same structure as in repo
21 matches
Mail list logo
