On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:47 -0300, ro...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi James, thanks for the fast answers, but I do not have access to the
> bug. Even logged in.
> Did I missed some step or do I have to request permission to someone ?
Ahh, I assume it's marked internal only. The main point is that to fi
version is creating extra
empty cache directories
Sent by:yum-devel-boun...@lists.baseurl.org
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 13:57 -0300, ro...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing Yum in RHEL 6.1 - Beta (yum-3.2.29-10.el6.noarch) and I
> am
> seeing what I would guess be a
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 13:57 -0300, ro...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing Yum in RHEL 6.1 - Beta (yum-3.2.29-10.el6.noarch) and I
> am
> seeing what I would guess be a bug.
> I have a plugin which adds repositories to Yum, and when I run yum,
> it
> creates an empty directory for each r
Hi,
I am testing Yum in RHEL 6.1 - Beta (yum-3.2.29-10.el6.noarch) and I am
seeing what I would guess be a bug.
I have a plugin which adds repositories to Yum, and when I run yum, it
creates an empty directory for each repo
in the current path with the name of the repo id. Similar when it creat
