On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:51 PM, James Antill wrote:
>
> Blah, it's been way too long and this first attempt mostly seems to
> work.
> What this patch does:
>
> 1. Stores a list of installed group id's, but only ID's ... we don't try
> to store the 666 names.
>
> 2. Stores a list of all package
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 18:12 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
> wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
> so :).
>
> I think the "big" issue people want to change is that given:
>
> yum install
Hi everybody!
I very much appreciate the effort to improve the handling of groups in
yum. Nevertheless I think this effort is too short sighted. The
mechanisms we use to handle packages still date back to the time where
Fedora had 1500 packages. We've see a growth (in number of packages) by
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 06:22 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> On 05/26/2009 09:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > There's still some amount of fiddles and bits perhaps required due to
> > repo enabling/disabling. But it feels a little bit better if we can get
> > the information into the rpmdb rather than
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:21 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26 2009, Seth Vidal said:
> > On Fri, 22 May 2009, James Antill wrote:
> >> Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
> >> wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
> >>
On 05/26/2009 09:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tuesday, May 26 2009, Seth Vidal said:
On Fri, 22 May 2009, James Antill wrote:
Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
so :).
[
On Tuesday, May 26 2009, Seth Vidal said:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, James Antill wrote:
>> Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
>> wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
>> so :).
[snip]
>> ...a couple of things that fall out of this:
>
On Fri, 22 May 2009, James Antill wrote:
Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
so :).
I think the "big" issue people want to change is that given:
yum install blah-package-in-KDE-
On 05/23/2009 12:12 AM, James Antill wrote:
Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
so :).
I think the "big" issue people want to change is that given:
yum install blah-package-in-KDE
Some thoughts about group DB (having groups as real objects). I mainly
wrote this for me, to see if "group DB" was actually possible. I think
so :).
I think the "big" issue people want to change is that given:
yum install blah-package-in-KDE-group
yum groupinstall KDE
yu
10 matches
Mail list logo
