On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:40:35PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Yeh, I figured you'd have the latest version available but I thought
> Debian had some compatibility stuff where people could easily have
> python2.5 or python2.4 installed at the same time as the latest version
> using current module
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 09:35 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
> I'm a Debian maintainer who happens to be on list, I can speak up for
> Debian and Ubuntu.
>
> Python >= 2.6 should be fine for any new upstream releases. All
> current or supported releases of Debian and Ubuntu have some version
> of 2.6 or
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:47 PM, James Antill wrote:
> Yeh, it's all easy and should work ... a lot of it looks ugly as sin
> though, and is annoyingly incompatible with anything before 2.6 for no
> other reason (and does nothing until pycurl is ported).
>
> In theory we can go the sys.exc_info()
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Zdeněk Pavlas wrote:
>
>> [PATCH 4/4] python3-compat: handle renamed modules and types
>>
>> Handle the random renaming of python modules.
>
> This one's ugly but I don't know a way around it. It s
Now that James has weighed in. Just some comments on compatibility if
someone does complain about python-2.4 compat.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Zdeněk Pavlas wrote:
>
> Q: Does it still run under Python2?
> A: Yes, that was the main focus. Python 2.6+ is required.
>
> [PATCH 1/4
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:37 +0200, Zdeněk Pavlas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Someday, we'll have to switch (or write a new module).
Not sure what you mean here.
> If we merge the easy bits first, it will be much easier.
Yeh, it's all easy and should work ... a lot of it looks ugly as sin
though, and is
Hi,
Someday, we'll have to switch (or write a new module).
If we merge the easy bits first, it will be much easier.
Q: Why urlgrabber?
A: It's going to be used by both Yum and DNF, and is relatively
small- a nice test bed to test how far one could get.
Q: Does it now run under Python3?
A: No, as
