Agreed, but I think there is broader use for knowing, from the conn.log, that
there were gaps. I think the 'g' character would address that.
I've always loved the history field and have found numerous uses for it over
the years.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: v...@icir.org On Behalf
> That could get very messy in the real world. How about start of first gap,=
> length of first gap, total number of gaps?
I think if the goal is to know whether DPD failed due to content gaps,
much better than trying to infer that from a set of gap information would
be for dpd.log to include "n
That could get very messy in the real world. How about start of first gap,
length of first gap, total number of gaps?
Sent with BlackBerry Work
(www.blackberry.com)
From: anthony kasza mailto:anthony.ka...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, Apr 10, 2019, 12:18 AM
To: Jim Mellander mailto:jmellan...@
