So https://github.com/J-Gras/bro-af_packet-plugin/issues/11 isn't an
issue anymore due to backwards compatible symlinks?
On 13/07/2019 03:22, Michał Purzyński wrote:
> We just migrated to master with the name change and the afpacket plugin, so I
> know the Zeek code is OK.
>
>
>> On Jul 12, 20
Hi Mauro,
On 14/03/2019 07:50, Mauro Palumbo wrote:
> However, I noticed that this works fine if new fields are added to the
> intel data file, but NOT if some fields are removed (for example if an
> ip address previously believed to be malicious is removed from the intel
> file because it was
On 12/03/2019 17:15, zeo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am working on improving the btests for the kafka writer plugin with the
> goal of validating some logic in KafkaWriter::DoInit. The best approach
> that I have so far is to write a BiF and use it in both DoInit and the
> btest via Zeek policy, but I
On 27/02/2019 20:40, Robin Sommer wrote:
>> One question here would be whether it makes sense to assume that the set of
>> LL-analyzers tash should be available is known at compile-time?
>
> The built-in ones can be known, but any added through dynamic plugins
> can't really. We'll know only at ru
On 26/02/2019 02:36, Robin Sommer wrote:
> I see three pieces here overall that I think can be tackled
> independently:
>
> (1) Link-layer: Currently hardcoded in Packet::ProcessLayer2()
>
> (2) IP-Layer: Currently hardcoded in NetSessions::NextPacket()
>
> (3) Transport-layer: Currently hardcod
To add a bit more context: The idea is to implement a plugin interface
for low-level analyzers (see https://github.com/zeek/zeek/issues/248)
and collect requirements on the list.
Some first thoughts and questions:
- What would be the lowest layer to built up on or should everything be
pluggable
On 06/02/2019 21:00, Jon Siwek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM Vlad Grigorescu wrote:
>
>> I _think_ I like Seth's idea of records, but I'm still thinking it through.
>> It would formalize a growing trend towards moving more parameters into
>> records anyway. If we're worried about back