On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:15 PM Michael Dopheide wrote:
>
> Generally the idea is to be mostly backward compatible so people aren't
> forced to make any changes to external plugins, but looks like there's a
> couple small things we overlooked or had not tested that we'll want to fix
> before the
We just migrated to master with the name change and the afpacket plugin, so I
know the Zeek code is OK.
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 5:52 PM, Jon Siwek wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Michael Dopheide wrote:
>> Background: We like to run 'master', but with the name change it
Just make sure you do not sniff the interface that you use for packet
storage. Nothing like a positive feedback loop that can happen because of
some crazy network configurations ;]
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vern Paxson wrote:
> > They would like to use a NAS (network attached storage) and
