** Branch linked: lp:~zeitgeist/zeitgeist/fix-646124
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team,
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: 0.6 = 0.5.2
--
Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team,
Taking the LeastRecentSubjects example. I'm going to assume you have
time=0 on the left and time0 on the right: 1, 2, 1, 3, 4.
Then One event for each subject only, ordered with oldest events first
would definitely mean: 1, 2, 3, 4. If we are sorting like RainCT is
proposing then the docstring
Exactly.
The current docstring matches the current returns. IMHO both are wrong
according to my and Siegfried's definition of LeastRecentActor. I do agree with
your proposal of changing the docstring to The most recent event for each
subject, ordered with the oldest events first. Because it
Seif, can you please give tow different usecases, one for the old
definition of LeastRecentActors and one for your new one. Please also
try to explain how changing the definition will influence real world
usecases.
--
Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Markus Korn thek...@gmx.de wrote:
Seif, can you please give tow different usecases, one for the old
definition of LeastRecentActors and one for your new one. Please also
try to explain how changing the definition will influence real world
usecases.
--
Ok, maybe there were some misunderstandings, I was looking for some real life
questions...
Let's assume this one:
What were the first three actors accessing '/home/markus/seif.txt'
With the current definition of LeastRecentActors the query would look like
template =
2010/9/24 Markus Korn thek...@gmx.de:
* Can you give me a similar question which gives a usecase for your
definition?
Which were the applications I haven't used for the most time?
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Free Software Developer 363DEAE3
--
Wrong understanding of
We discussed this issue on IRC, a summary:
* the current definition of LeastRecentActors is wrong, it should be
application I have not used for the longest time
* we need a new ResultType for the old definition (The first event of each
different actor), something like OldestActor
The plan to
9 matches
Mail list logo
