Alright.. but doesn't this mean zenloadbalancer can not be used on any SMTP
server with anti-spam? (any kind of anti-spam).
As all anti-spams lookup the external send server, spf record.. etc.. (and on
mailbombs, reported servers etc - block the ip for a period of time).
I'm not sure what exactl
Hi Marco, Zen works on sNAT method, if you need a transparent load balancer
the loadbalancer need to be the gw of your mail gateways, and at the moment
this isn't implemented. If it's a problem for INPUT mails, on this case I
recommend you use dns load balancing with priorities, this is the method
Hello,
I came cross another small issue.. but in this case quite importand:
When I use loadbalancer to balance our SMTP the anti-spam actually thinks the
loadbalancer send the email.
Here's the mail headers WITH Loadbalancer:
Received: from col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com (192.168.0.34) by
MAIL2.
Thank you,
That solves my doubts. ( i just wanted to double check everything as it seemed
a little bit odd ;))
I did run in another issue however I will post that in a new topic
(our anti-spam smtp picks up on the loadbalancer ip instead of the real
originating server who send the mail -.-)
Rega
The failover problem I saw was this:
I have 3-4 different farms configured and after a rough period of 24hr the
primary would failover to the secondary(for no apparent reason) but not all the
farms would fail over as when I logged into the secondary I had some farms down
along with their interf
Hi Hatem,
With how many concurrent connections the problem is produced?
Could you send me the /var/log/syslog and /var/log/messages files
compressed and the timestamp when the problem is produced?
Regards,
Laura.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Hatem Nassrat wrote:
> I have the same issue w
Hi Steve,
I write over your mail.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Steve LePage wrote:
> I think I may have found my cluster issue in regards to the failover not
> working correctly. The throughput issue seems fine now with the additions
> and running on a single LB for the last week and a half
Hi,
Steve please can you send us the next data to study the problem:
1º ethtool output of all interfaces
2º a screenshot of "Settings::Interfaces"
3º really which interfaces have link?
Also check if other information that ethtool shows is correct, for example
the speed
Maybe could be some prob
Hi Marco,
Active clients are not active connections. Active clients is about the IP
clients "memorized" by the farm when you select support for persistence by
client.
With persistence by client enabled, every time a client start a connection
will be delivered to the same server so the behaviour o
Mine stopped going down when I removed the cluster and ran on the 1 server,
Does it go down when it's configured as a single?
From: Hatem Nassrat [mailto:ha...@genieknows.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 2:13 PM
To: zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Zenloadbalancer
I have the same issue with large loads. The farm goes down nearly once a
day, even after making the fix mentioned. I am running v1 stable and also
use eth0:X virtual interfaces.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Steve LePage wrote:
> I think I may have found my cluster issue in regards to the fail
I think I may have found my cluster issue in regards to the failover not
working correctly. The throughput issue seems fine now with the additions and
running on a single LB for the last week and a half has proven that the system
works correctly.
What I noticed today is that some of my farms vi
Hi Zen Admins!
Now the complete ZenLB documentation you were waiting for is avaliable
through the URL http://zenloadbalancer.com/index.php?id=3 .
Hope it will be useful.
Feel free to comment about errors, traductions or other stuff!
Regards,
Laura.
-
not sure about these NICs precisely
but in general avoid using Broadcom NICs on production servers
i would rather plug another intel PCIe to make sure all is stable and under
control
2011/12/6 Steve LePage
> I have found some more information on this issue…
>
> ** **
>
> Here are the ada
I have found some more information on this issue...
Here are the adaptors and chipsets:
02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 10)
02:02.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 10)
0a:01.0 Ethernet co
I have my public interface eth0 setup with a public IP and have a default
gateway setup e.g.:
Eth0: 200.1.1.10/27
GW 200.1.1.1/27 (default GW)
And this all works including the gui and I can add farms to it.
Eth0/1 are on board and 2/3 are an Intel GE PCI adaptor which the linux system
and zen
I followed all steps, but still have the same message. maybe it a problem with
a Oracle's VirtualBox or something like that, it is wierd that i can ssh
connect from 1 machine to 2 and other way around but get ERROR on testing RSA
connection.
From: José García
Hello,
After the last port range request i did decide to actively use Zenloadbalancer
for the services we can at this point.
We got anti-spam gateways filtering Exchange servers.. (clustered but non-load
balanced)
I have put the ZenLoadbalancer in front.. mail flow seems very solid (with a
nic
18 matches
Mail list logo
