Wolfgang,
Thanks for letting us know we're heading in the right direction. It's been
the work of many people.
-Pieter
On 15 Sep 2010 01:31, "Wolfgang Richter" wrote:
> I was just looking at the new 0MQ sites, I must say things are looking
> really nice.
>
> The Guide is especially looking nice.
I was just looking at the new 0MQ sites, I must say things are looking
really nice.
The Guide is especially looking nice. Great work and thanks to all
involved!
--
Wolf
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org
Hi,
As it stands zeromq.spec does not build:
$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/zeromq.spec
<.. snip ..>
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/include/zmq_utils.h
/usr/share/man/man3/zmq_errno.3.gz
/usr/share/man/man3/zmq_getsockopt.3.gz
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackage
Hi Chuck,
It works as you described. This is how i wanted it to work.
Greetings
Stefan
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Stefan Majer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I´m implementing a application which is basically a kind of log
>> collection framework
Naveen,
Thanks for the patches, they're applied and pushed.
-Pieter
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Naveen Chawla wrote:
> MIT/X11 licensed
>
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zer
On 14 September 2010 12:46, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 06:40 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
>
> The timeout is more likely in the range milliseconds to microseconds for
>> rate limiting. 0.1s can be valid for recovery.
>>
>
> Ok, so we have 2 windows. One for "already sent stuff" (recovery
Martin,
One other ? on this one: is there any reason the loss would be worse
on Windows that Mac or Linux?
Thanks,
Brian
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Brian,
>
>> The expected behavior is:
>>
>> * While the server is down, the XREQ socket will queue messages.
>> *
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Brian,
>
>> The expected behavior is:
>>
>> * While the server is down, the XREQ socket will queue messages.
>> * Once the server comes back up, the queued messages will be sent.
>> * No messages will be lost.
>>
>> The observed behavior is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Wait a sec. That makes the problem even worse.
>
> The goal is: 1. google for zeromq 2. hit I'm lucky button 3. land on the
> simple newbies page (currently www.zeromq.com)
Making microsites for projects doesn't affect this. Zeromq.org is
On 09/14/2010 06:40 PM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> The timeout is more likely in the range milliseconds to microseconds for
> rate limiting. 0.1s can be valid for recovery.
Ok, so we have 2 windows. One for "already sent stuff" (recovery buffer)
another for "stuff to be sent" (rate limiting buffer).
On 14 September 2010 12:36, Jonathan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there are any plans or even desire for ØMQ to
> support the Windows CE/Mobile platform.
Seems a tad limited as Windows Phone 7 changes everything and importantly
drops access to the network stack.
--
Steve-o
_
On 14 September 2010 12:36, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> > Major hurdle is implementing a cross platform timeout mechanism
> > otherwise spin loops drive out maximum CPU time for each transport. The
> > caveats of user space network protocols.
>
> Have you considered using already built-in 0MQ timer?
Jonathan,
> I was wondering if there are any plans or even desire for ØMQ to
> support the Windows CE/Mobile platform.
Nobody really tried so far AFAIK. Doesn't it work out of the box?
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http
Hi Steven,
> Major hurdle is implementing a cross platform timeout mechanism
> otherwise spin loops drive out maximum CPU time for each transport. The
> caveats of user space network protocols.
Have you considered using already built-in 0MQ timer? It's pretty lame
as the only interval it can wa
Hello,
I was wondering if there are any plans or even desire for ØMQ to
support the Windows CE/Mobile platform.
Thanks very much,
Jonathan
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
ZeroMQ is hitting the mainstream... hope we're ready for the wave of
newcomers.
On 14 Sep 2010 16:09, "Martin Sustrik" wrote:
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/09/introduction-zero-mq
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http:/
On 13 September 2010 04:14, Martin Lucina wrote:
> If configure fails it means you don't have the appropriate 32-bit libraries
> installed.
>
Yup, I wouldn't try cross architecture with PGM support with the 2.0.x
build. This however will be resolved in a future release built against
OpenPGM 5.
On 10 September 2010 08:56, Christian Gudrian wrote:
> Am 10.09.2010 10:38, schrieb Christian Gudrian:
>
> > I'll try to dig a little bit deeper to shed some more light on this
> issue.
>
> Well, obviously it's a problem with libpgm-2.1.27 on Windows. I wrote a
> little test application right on
MIT/X11 licensed
0001-Multithreaded-relay-not-tested.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Alignment-sorted.patch
Description: Binary data
0003-Multithreaded-server-untested.patch
Description: Binary data
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.z
http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/09/introduction-zero-mq
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Hi Martin,
>> * I learnt somewhere that zeromq 0.3 had a "locator" daemon providing
>> similar functionality, though it seems not to be part of the core
>> library anymore. What happenned to it?
>The problem with a location service is that for large deployments you
>need a real production-qualit
On 09/14/2010 02:10 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> The Guide is now a separate microsite at http://zguide.zeromq.org.
> I'll be starting other microsites for the ZFL and zdevices projects
> along the same style.
Wait a sec. That makes the problem even worse.
The goal is: 1. google for zeromq 2. hi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> This would be nice to link from somewhere, but it looks like there's no
> page on zeromq.org to link projects from. There used to be one, but I am
> not able to find it anymore.
It's the Labs page... http://www.zeromq.org/docs:labs
Ps. I
Zeroconf solves two issues at the same time through mdns: IP without DHCP
and names without DNS.
The part related to service registration/discovery (names) is not trivial
but not that hard to mimic, especially if we follow the detailed 60 pages on
the subject in "Zero Configuration Networking" (O'
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 15:01 +0200, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :
> Olivier,
>
> Thanks a lot for the C++ examples. I'm redoing chapter 3 because some
> of it is not accurate, especially the parts that deal with identities.
> In fact generating random identities just creates junk, and the
> d
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> This would be nice to link from somewhere, but it looks like there's no
> page on zeromq.org to link projects from. There used to be one, but I am
> not able to find it anymore.
It's the Labs page... http://www.zeromq.org/docs:labs
-
Piet
Am 14.09.2010 14:42, schrieb Kelly Brock:
> Zeroconf is actually a relatively tricky protocol
I'm not trying to implement _the_ Zeroconf protocol (as did avahi and
Bonjour). I was thinking of a much simpler approach that does not
require a locator service. Let's say a client needs a certain s
Olivier,
Thanks a lot for the C++ examples. I'm redoing chapter 3 because some
of it is not accurate, especially the parts that deal with identities.
In fact generating random identities just creates junk, and the
durable subscriber doesn't quite work properly.
Best would be if you clone the gi
Hi Azamat,
> * I learnt somewhere that zeromq 0.3 had a "locator" daemon providing
> similar functionality, though it seems not to be part of the core
> library anymore. What happenned to it?
The problem with a location service is that for large deployments you
need a real production-quality dis
Hi,
> > The real trick is platform dependency
>
> It should be possible to write a real platform independent zeroconf
> solution based solely upon ZMQ and OpenPGM.
>
> Christian
It is always possible but I'm not sure it is wise. Zeroconf is
actually a relatively tricky protocol and you
Hello everybody,
I am Azamat. I am new here. My research group started using ZeroMQ for a
robotics software project and our experience so far "IT IS COOL"!
Sorry that I bring up this topic of zeroconf again, but in our project it is
also one of the requirements. It seems to be discussed a lot in
Hi,
Modification of the C++ zguide's examples (part 1 & 2), using
"zhelpers.hpp" and addition of Part 3 examples.
Licensed under MIT/X11.
Btw some (2 cts) comments :
* i think you forgot adding the "All language" link under "zhelpers.h"
in part 1 of the guide.
* What about adding some "prev
Hi all,
I've made some changes to the ZeroMQ websites.
The www.zeromq.org site has a thumbnail that points to www.zeromq.com,
which is the "Start Here" project for new users. We're still finding
that a lot of new visitors miss this site and (we think) get lost in
the community site.
The Guide i
Hi
According to the docs IPC is not implemented on Windows.
Regards,
Mikael
>
> It's not working on Windows.
>
> I just do "ipc://whateverIlike"... in "bind" and "connect", right?
> Or do I need to do something else first?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
It's not working on Windows.
I just do "ipc://whateverIlike"... in "bind" and "connect", right?
Or do I need to do something else first?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Naveen,
The patch doesn't apply. Send me (offlist) a full new source for this, thanks.
-Pieter
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Naveen Chawla wrote:
> Shouldn't have used tabs in the first place.
> Needs the 0003 patch first.
> (MIT/X11 licensed)
>
> __
Shouldn't have used tabs in the first place.
Needs the 0003 patch first.
(MIT/X11 licensed)
0004-Sorry-now-it-looks-like-the-C-example.patch
Description: Binary data
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman
On 09/14/2010 10:40 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Hi Daisuke,
>
> You can create and destroy contexts in a test case like that, as long
> as you're aware that these are separate 0MQ instances that can't
> communicate over inproc:.
Correct.
> Forking is something we didn't cover yet in the Guide.
Hi Daisuke,
You can create and destroy contexts in a test case like that, as long
as you're aware that these are separate 0MQ instances that can't
communicate over inproc:.
Forking is something we didn't cover yet in the Guide. You cannot
create a context and pass it to a child process. The pro
My tests do this in the same file:
{ # test case 1
my $ctxt = ZeroMQ::Context->new(); # internally calls zmq_init();
... test code here
} # contxt freed
{ # test case 2
my $ctxt = ZeroMQ::Context->new(); # internally calls zmq_init();
... test code here .
Such a library could start by skipping the auto IP attribution (consider
network devices have an IP address). Then we would only need a broadcast
address where a newcomer can arrive and say:
- where is "funky synth" (the newcomer's own name)
.. no reply
- I am "funky synth" and I talk "foo" protoc
41 matches
Mail list logo
