Hi Colin,
> Yes, I wrote this pub/sub gist to demonstrate: https://gist.github.com/918471
>
> Again, this is with 0MQ 2.1.3, JRuby 1.6.0, FFI ruby bindings ffi-rzmq
> (0.7.2) on OSX.
I've created a ticket for the problem:
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/191
Martin
__
Has anyone had success using zeromq in a J2EE application?
Joshua
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Hi,
Thanks, I got it! Its the bind/connect that I mixed up.
tj
--- On Wed, 13/4/11, Ian Barber wrote:
From: Ian Barber
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] newbie helloworld Help
To: "ZeroMQ development list"
Date: Wednesday, 13 April, 2011, 6:11 PM
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ng Teng Jie wr
hello, I'm installing zeromq under windows,
I use python2.6 (pythonxy), and I run:
c:> easy_install pyzmq
Searching for pyzmq
Best match: pyzmq 2.1.4
Processing pyzmq-2.1.4-py2.6-win32.egg
pyzmq 2.1.4 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
Using c:\python26\lib\site-packages\pyzmq-2.1
Hi,
Yes, I wrote this pub/sub gist to demonstrate: https://gist.github.com/918471
Again, this is with 0MQ 2.1.3, JRuby 1.6.0, FFI ruby bindings ffi-rzmq
(0.7.2) on OSX.
Colin
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
>> I am using 0mq 2.1.3 with the FFI ruby bindings
Hi Colin,
> I am using 0mq 2.1.3 with the FFI ruby bindings ffi-rzmq (0.7.2) with
> JRuby 1.6.0.
>
> When doing some stress testing using PUB/SUB sockets with multipart
> (3) messages at different watermark levels and message rates I
> encountered a situation, at high rate and low watermark, where
Hi,
I am using 0mq 2.1.3 with the FFI ruby bindings ffi-rzmq (0.7.2) with
JRuby 1.6.0.
When doing some stress testing using PUB/SUB sockets with multipart
(3) messages at different watermark levels and message rates I
encountered a situation, at high rate and low watermark, where not
only some me
At Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:57:53 +0100, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> 3. In parallel, binding maintainers can start making bindings work with
> 3.0. To minimise the work we can possibly deliver a compatibility header
> that translates 2.x.x-style calls to 3.x.x-style calls. Unfortunately,
> there's not m
It was entirely an accident, due to my lack of experience on Windows. I will
push replacements, later today.
Thanks!
-MinRK
On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:06, Ben James wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently found that there are Windows installers for pyzmq at
> https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/downloads - this
Hi,
I recently found that there are Windows installers for pyzmq at
https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/downloads - this is really useful!
I used pyzmq-2.1.4.win32-py2.7.msi and found that the libzmq DLL which
is packaged with this seems to be a debug build, which means that I
still need to have Visu
Hi Marko,
> The application could simply bind several zeromq sockets on the same
> ip/port, providing that they have different 'virtual hosts', and zmq
> will attach new connections
> to the correct sockets after reading the 'vhost' label in the first frame.
>
> Sorry, perhaps I entered late in th
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Dan Ellis wrote:
> I'm re-posting this here, because the IRC channel is very quiet.
Easter holidays, at least in some parts of the world...
> I was thinking zmq would be an excellent protocol to build upon for a
> chat server...
For sure.
> I could have the au
On 13 April 2011 09:44, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 09:26 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
>
> > Ah, I should have said IP+DNS rather than just IP. Sorry.
>
> I would suggest looking at the design of HTTP, which is pretty similar
> to the "send-to-address" pattern we are discussing.
>
> HTTP i
Hi Tore,
> Are there any plans to use IOCP for tcp connections on windows?
Yes. It was discussed many times (search the mailing list archive for
IOCP) and couple people even gave implementation a try. But, somehow, it
haven't materialised so far.
Martin
___
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ng Teng Jie wrote:
> Pardon this newbie, I cannot get the sample hello world server/client to
> work.
>
> I am suspecting that I need to open the port through "iptables" in
> ubuntu? Is that right? Code in C is used as in the documentation.
>
> Thanks for any
Hi,
Are there any plans to use IOCP for tcp connections on windows?
--
Eld på åren og sol på eng gjer mannen fegen og fjåg. [Jøtul]
2011 Tore Halvorsen || +052 0553034554
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/
Pardon this newbie, I cannot get the sample hello world server/client to work.
I am suspecting that I need to open the port through "iptables" in ubuntu?
Is that right? Code in C is used as in the documentation.
Thanks for any help! :)
___
zeromq
>From 5444064c1a195daee5e57eb996157393a4eed796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Sustrik
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:33:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Minor cleanup of preprocessor definitions for OpenPGM
Signed-off-by: Martin Sustrik
---
src/pgm_socket.hpp |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion
>From 933ace0919974628c8ac2f9ada67645fdf4c80e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Sustrik
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:06:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MSVC build fixed to reflect zmq.cpp split
Signed-off-by: Martin Sustrik
---
builds/msvc/libzmq/libzmq.vcproj | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9
On 04/13/2011 09:26 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Ah, I should have said IP+DNS rather than just IP. Sorry.
I would suggest looking at the design of HTTP, which is pretty similar
to the "send-to-address" pattern we are discussing.
HTTP is successful because it doesn't try to reinvent the wheel. I
On 04/13/2011 08:53 AM, Paul Colomiets wrote:
> Yes, you can say that this is covered by IP. But isn't what covered by IP is
> also covered by ethernet?
IP solves a well defined problem: How to integrate arbitrary amount of
Ethernets into a single addressable network. We need a similar
definiti
21 matches
Mail list logo
