Hi Chuck,
The patch is now merged into the trunk.
Note that I've renamed the function to zmq_getmsgopt(), the rationale
being as follows:
1. The mechanism is more extensible (allows for non-bool options)
2. Leaves door open for future zmq_setmsgopt()
3. Is consistent with zmq_getsockopt()
Thank
Can I ask what the relationship of 3.0 and 3.1 is now? Is 3.0 deprecated,
and 3.1 just the current dev version?
I'm trying to figure out what I should be doing with pyzmq. I had
integrated some support for the LABEL code, which remains in 3.0, but I
presume is to be removed.
On Sat, Nov 5, 20
Hello. 05.11.2011, 20:07, "Andrew Hume" :i think i still do not understand.flow control != monitoring Yes, I am guilty of this confusion. This is about monitoring, not flow control. having said all that, ilja, what monitoring would you want? First of all I am interested in number of messages recei
Hi Guys,
I'm sure this question is pretty trivial for the mailing list but I've
searched everywhere in the documentation and examples section. I can't find the
Syntax for closing a socket anywhere. Also is there a full documentation for
the C# language that contains all the method definition
and you're okay with a fair amount of imprecision, right?
(buffers in flight and so on.)
On Nov 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 05.11.2011, 20:07, "Andrew Hume" :
> i think i still do not understand.
> flow control != monitoring
>
> Yes, I am guilty of this confusion.
Hi Guys,
I have a very light weight application that uses the ZMQ library to receive
messages from an address. What happens is every 10seconds, a new request is
made to the server to process and receive messages. Now after this runs for
some 20-30minutes the system where ZMQ connects to cras
Have a source for this now: from the mechanical sympathy blog, 1µs for
InfiniBand and 5µs for Mellanox/Solarflare user-space IP with RDMA 10GigE.
http://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/2011/11/locks-condition-variables-latency.html
My current standing is that IB is always a fraction faster than
On 11/07/2011 02:08 AM, lanre lawal wrote:
> I have a very light weight application that uses the ZMQ library to
> receive messages from an address. What happens is every 10seconds, a new
> request is made to the server to process and receive messages. Now after
> this runs for some 20-30minutes t
An interesting article about AMQP, OpenMAMA and massaging market:
OpenMAMA pitted against AMQP in battle system finance
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/31/messaging_system_fight/
Daniel
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http:/
