Hi,
I am a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University and am trying to install
ZeroMQ with its Python bindings on a RHEL 6 box (Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Workstation release 6.1 (Santiago)).
I first tried getting the source from the ZeroMQ website and building it.
The build finishes successfully and
Well, in case you haven't heard, this saturday is the day for the
Portland, OR, ZeroMQ Conference. A whole day dedicated to discussing
our favorite messaging technology with fantastic presentations given
by some seriously smart people.
For those of you who haven't heard and would like to go, plea
Hello Peter,
On 20/02/2012 17:21, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL wrote:
>>> - LIBZMQ-268
>>> - LIBZMQ-283
> These same to be the same problem?
Not exactly.
In LIBZMQ-268, the whole multipart mes
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL wrote:
>> - LIBZMQ-268
>> - LIBZMQ-283
These same to be the same problem?
>> - LIBZMQ-286
>> could be fixed before ZMQ 3.1 becomes the stable release. They are
>> annoying for our cases.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL wrote:
> For our usage of ZMQ, we would be very pleased if issues
>
> - LIBZMQ-268
> - LIBZMQ-283
> - LIBZMQ-286
>
> could be fixed before ZMQ 3.1 becomes the stable release. They are
> annoying for our cases.
Ack.
I'd recommend (a) marking them a
Hello all,
On 17/02/2012 00:14, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's probably a good time to start moving 0MQ/3.1 towards stable status.
>
> Several things you can do to help:
>
> * If you have outstanding issues in 3.1 that you need fixed, please
> remind us of them
For our usage of ZMQ, we
