Hi Mikhail, how difficult is it to reproduce the assertion failure?
- Martin
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Mikhail Navernyuk
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> In my program I've got an assertion in mailbox.cpp:84 (zeromq-2.1.11).
> Could you explain me why this might hapenning?
> I use singlethread
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Sergey Hripchenko
wrote:
> Could you please look at the following patch:
> https://github.com/shripchenko/libzmq/commit/0c3d9179262ab431b8949b8646eed9a1a1e4a233
I've made a couple of comments on the commit. It looks pretty good...
-Pieter
Hey all,
I'd have logged this in jira, but there's no 2.2.0 version available
there yet and I wanted to let people know about it.
I'm having a build issue in the new 2.2.0 release. Looks like a broken
GCC version check in blob.hpp:
#if (defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ == 3))
#include "gcc_421_ch
Could you please look at the following patch:
https://github.com/shripchenko/libzmq/commit/0c3d9179262ab431b8949b8646eed9a1a1e4a233
I implemented new setsockopts(): ZMQ_TCP_KEEPALIVE, ZMQ_TCP_KEEPALIVE_CNT,
ZMQ_TCP_KEEPALIVE_IDLE, ZMQ_TCP_KEEPALIVE_INTVL
to configure TCP keep-alives on TCP socke
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ronald Swain wrote:
> I have PUB/SUB system with a zmq FORWARDER device, and there all clients
> have the capability of sending and receiving , so what is happening, that
> whenever a single client publishes a message all other subscriber get it
> which is correct
