On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
>> Judging by the "critical issues" on the wiki site, most of them are
>> associated with 2.2. None of the listed tickets are for 3.2.
>>
>> Is it time to push 3.2rc1 to 3.2 final?
>
> I still want
Hi,
I am writing a lib that uses zmq. This lib is going to be used in an app
that already has an external select() loop. Can I use fd's retrieved from
ZMQ_FD from zmq_getsockopt() in that select loop successfully ?
Are there examples already that tell you how to do it ? Are there any
things that
On 31 July 2012 09:00, Sebastian Lauwers wrote:
> If this research is correct, then I guess two things could be done
> (again, feel free to add other possibilities if you see them, I'm
> shooting in the dark here):
> - Find a way to properly create the addr object before creating the
> session obj
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Chuck Remes wrote:
> Judging by the "critical issues" on the wiki site, most of them are
> associated with 2.2. None of the listed tickets are for 3.2.
>
> Is it time to push 3.2rc1 to 3.2 final?
I still want to provide a test for multipacket pubsub in 3.2. We are still
unab
Judging by the "critical issues" on the wiki site, most of them are associated
with 2.2. None of the listed tickets are for 3.2.
Is it time to push 3.2rc1 to 3.2 final?
cr
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org
I'd like to update this page (http://www.zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software) to
recommend new users of the library start out with 3.2 (release candidate is
fine) instead of 2.2.
How do I modify this page? It isn't part of the wiki that I can see, so my
usual "edit this page" trickery won't work
although i don't use this interface,
i think the precedent of having send return an error is bad.
the issue is an old one: if i do a send, did it get there?
there is only one way to answer that correctly, which is an end-to-end scheme.
anything else is half-assed, and to the extent that having a r
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:58 +0300, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Hi Vitally,
>
> Can you send any patch to 2.2 as a pull request, with a corresponding
> issue in the issue tracker?
Hi Pieter,
I have created jira issue for this - LIBZMQ-411 ZMQ 2.x compilation
problems when building with disabled asse
somehow i missed the front of this.
can someone recap the proposal?
On Aug 3, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:50 AM, AJ Lewis wrote:
>
>> Can we look at changing the return type of zmsg_send() to be an
>> int? I know that would break compatibility, so maybe
Hi,
I would like to know if you have any performance comparisons of ZeroMQ and
Boost ASIO on Ubuntu Linux Server (the latest version).
Thanks for the help,
-Asif
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/li
2012/8/2 Michel Pelletier :
> Specifically, check out cliff's cool interactive mode:
>
> http://cliff.readthedocs.org/en/latest/interactive_mode.html
>
>>
>> I would suggest looking at the ROUTER socket in detail and
>> specifically the LRU pattern in the guide. You may only need the
>> "back-half
2012/8/2 Michel Pelletier :
> I would avoid stretching the file abstraction over a zmq socket like
> that. Maybe another library that is more flexible for command line
> and simple interpreters like cliff
> (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/cliff/) would be easier for you to
> integrate with zmq. Cmd
On 03/08/12 10:10, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> It seems a small breakage for a useful change... let's see if anyone
> vetoes it. If not, I'd suggest sending the pull request.
How would it create breakage, though? Unless people are using
boost::function<> or something of sorts, I don't see why anyone
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:50 AM, AJ Lewis wrote:
> Can we look at changing the return type of zmsg_send() to be an
> int? I know that would break compatibility, so maybe that's a
> non-starter.
It seems a small breakage for a useful change... let's see if anyone
vetoes it. If not, I'd suggest se
14 matches
Mail list logo
