On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dave Rutlidge wrote:
> I've been trying to write a broker using ZMQ and found that it would
> occasionally lock my PC totally, requiring a power-off as the usual
> Ctrl-Alt-Del etc, and even a shutdown request by pressing the power button
> did nothing.
Try using
On 6 August 2012 08:19, Pierre Ynard wrote:
>
>
> > It's been removed because of discussions like this
>
> This is now a discussion about the underlying issues of the PGM
> transport, not limited to ZMQ_MCAST_LOOP. Removing the option that made
> the issue most visible so that people don't compl
On 6 August 2012 17:34, Stuart Levy wrote:
> Hmm. So can we tell what is the consequence of that, at ZMQ level, if
> NAKs get lost?
>
PGM continues until the protocol breaks then the window will be flushed
until it can recover. A constant high data rate will likely not permit the
receiver to r
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:40 AM, AJ Lewis wrote:
> So the ABI hasn't changed from zeromq 3.0 to 3.2, is that correct?
The ABI version isn't the same as the product version. It was moved to
3.0.0 in 0MQ/3.1.0.
> Typically you'd want to at least rev the last number for every
> release so you could
On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Dave Rutlidge wrote:
> I've been trying to write a broker using ZMQ and found that it would
> occasionally lock my PC totally, requiring a power-off as the usual
> Ctrl-Alt-Del etc, and even a shutdown request by pressing the power button
> did nothing.
>
> I tried
I've been trying to write a broker using ZMQ and found that it would
occasionally lock my PC totally, requiring a power-off as the usual
Ctrl-Alt-Del etc, and even a shutdown request by pressing the power button
did nothing.
I tried simpler and simpler examples and still have the same things happe
On 8/2/12 6:20 AM, Pierre Ynard wrote:
>> The OS only forwards packets to the first open socket.
>> Check the RFC's on PGM and PGMCC for details of the protocols in
>> question,
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3208.txt
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/57/I-D/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-pgmcc-02.txt
> To
I am using the NuGet packages you suggest but the CZMQ stuff doesn’t seem
to be there.
For example, the code at http://zguide.zeromq.org/cs:lruqueue2 won't
compile as the ZMessage stuff isn't there.
Regards
Dave
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:57 AM, OJ Reeves wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Do you absolut
Great Pieter!
Congrats to All!
Felipe
2012/8/6 Brian Knox
> Well this is a nice thing to come back from vacation to!
>
> Brian
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Ian Barber wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've cut a version 1.2.0 r
Stuff I ran into when implementing:
1) Be aware that ZMQ_FD only generates read events. You then check ZMQ_EVENTS
to see what actually happened.
2) You need to check ZMQ_EVENTS in three situations: after ZMQ_FD read event,
after calling zmq_send, and after calling zmq_recv. It was only recently
Answers are inline.
On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:18 AM, diffuser78 wrote:
> Can someone plz share their experiences around this problem ?
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, diffuser78 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a lib that uses zmq. This lib is going to be used in an app that
> already has an ex
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 08:21:12PM +0900, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Allan Wind
> wrote:
>
> > ./lib/libzmq.so.3.0.0
> > ./lib/libzmq.so.3
>
> I guess this is the ABI version. Not sure why there are two files but
> this is how it seems to work. :)
So the ABI hasn'
Can someone plz share their experiences around this problem ?
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, diffuser78 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a lib that uses zmq. This lib is going to be used in an app
> that already has an external select() loop. Can I use fd's retrieved from
> ZMQ_FD from zmq_getsock
in any case, don't forget the EAGAIN case
(which seems to be rather more common in MacOS environments).
On Aug 6, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Bjorn Reese wrote:
> On 2012-08-06 13:58, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
>
>> I thought to replace this call (see code at
>> https://github.com/zeromq/rbzmq/blob/master/rbz
On 2012-08-06 13:58, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
> I thought to replace this call (see code at
> https://github.com/zeromq/rbzmq/blob/master/rbzmq.c#L1573 )
>
> rc = zmq_send (s,&msg, flags);
>
> by this:
>
> int do_loop=1;
> while ( do_loop>0) {
> rc = zmq_send (s,&msg, fla
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 01:22:31PM +0900, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Andrew Hume wrote:
>
> > the issue is an old one: if i do a send, did it get there? there
> > is only one way to answer that correctly, which is an end-to-end
> > scheme. anything else is half-as
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> In fact the fix was already pushed in master:
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/commit/271ced98cf55447260d8c13086126b74ef1df215
OK, I'm backporting that to 3.2. Thanks for pointing it out.
Am trying now to not close issues until they've bee
Well this is a nice thing to come back from vacation to!
Brian
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Ian Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've cut a version 1.2.0 release for CZMQ.
> >
>
> 1.2! Congrats Pieter :)
>
> Ian
> ___
> > LIBZMQ-375 doesn't seem fixed in 3.2
>
> It's marked in the bug tracker as "trivial." If you have a fix for it,
> please send a pull request.
>
> https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-375
In fact the fix was already pushed in master:
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/commit/271ced98cf5544726
> It's been removed because of discussions like this
This is now a discussion about the underlying issues of the PGM
transport, not limited to ZMQ_MCAST_LOOP. Removing the option that made
the issue most visible so that people don't complain about it is just
sweeping under the rug.
> 0MQ makes
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Chuck Remes wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using the ruby zmq bindings in a web application. I regularly get
>>> error message "ZMQ::Error: Interrupted
On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:01 AM, Pierre Ynard wrote:
>> Judging by the "critical issues" on the wiki site, most of them are
>> associated with 2.2. None of the listed tickets are for 3.2.
>>
>> Is it time to push 3.2rc1 to 3.2 final?
>
> LIBZMQ-375 doesn't seem fixed in 3.2
It's marked in the bug tr
> Judging by the "critical issues" on the wiki site, most of them are
> associated with 2.2. None of the listed tickets are for 3.2.
>
> Is it time to push 3.2rc1 to 3.2 final?
LIBZMQ-375 doesn't seem fixed in 3.2
--
Pierre Ynard
"Une âme dans un corps, c'est comme un dessin sur une feuille de
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've cut a version 1.2.0 release for CZMQ.
>
1.2! Congrats Pieter :)
Ian
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
24 matches
Mail list logo
