On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Chernyshev Vyacheslav wrote:
>>
>> #1 zmq::ctx_t::monitor_event () at ctx.cpp:405
>> #2 zmq::socket_base_t::monitor_event () at socket_base.cpp:1004
>> #3 zmq::session_base_t::monitor_event () at session_
If you read the contribution process, you'll see that maintainers don't
verify patches for content, only form. Our goal is to get your changes into
master as soon as possible so you and others can test them immediately.
It's actually more effective than playing gatekeeper.
Pieter
On Aug 23, 2012 1
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Ben Scharp wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:php page says that the PHP zeromq
> binding can be obtained/built via PEAR at pear.zero.mq. This resource
> appears to be unreachable. If it truly is down, is it going to return? Or
> is the onl
Greetings,
The http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:php page says that the PHP zeromq
binding can be obtained/built via PEAR at pear.zero.mq. This resource
appears to be unreachable. If it truly is down, is it going to return? Or
is the only way to obtain the binding through GitHub? I'd like to install
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Chernyshev Vyacheslav wrote:
>
> #1 zmq::ctx_t::monitor_event () at ctx.cpp:405
> #2 zmq::socket_base_t::monitor_event () at socket_base.cpp:1004
> #3 zmq::session_base_t::monitor_event () at session_base.cpp:293
>
> What this code does is passing va_list as a p
Yeah, and there are still issues with this test, checked it right now.
First, zmq_bind splits its argument into 2 parts: protocol and address
("tcp" and "127.0.0.1:5560" in our case).
zmq::tcp_listener_t::set_address function receives already stripped
address part, so comparison will fail again.
repeat after me:
a load-balancing fair-share message routing system is NOT a job
scheduler.
it nearly can do a related thing, but its not.
there are several ways to do this; i'm sure teh guide covers a couple.
i would normally handle this one of two ways:
a) if tasks are expensive, then
Hi Chernyshev,
Actually I have already posted a pull request for the test_monitor
issue, and it has already been pulled by ianbarber!
Thanks to ianbarber for those pulls --- although I'm slightly
disturbed by the fact that they happened like 30 seconds after I
posted the requests. That doesn'
Oh, nevermind. Test case was fixed. My bad.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Thank you. What do you think about other problems in test_monitor? I
will partially repeat my message posted in thread "Reporting make check
error". Do not want to create a pull request without discussing this
issue with others, even if it seems that issue is really present.
First, memcmp retur
I'm a little stumped about how to handle network failures in a system that uses
PUSH/PULL sockets as in the Parallel Pipeline case in chapter 2 of The Guide.
As in the Guide, suppose my ventilator is pushing tasks to 3 workers. It
doesn't matter which task gets pushed to which worker, but it's
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Chernyshev Vyacheslav wrote:
>>
>> In recent git master tree there are 2 tests with issues that cause
>> compilation errors if warnings are treated as errors and NDEBUG is
>> defined during compilation.
> [.
Hi,
I am doing some benchmarks with an optimized Java NIO selector on Linux
over loopback (127.0.0.1).
My test is very simple:
- One program sends an UDP packet to another program that echoes it back to
the sender and the round trip time is computed. The next packet is only
sent when the previou
On 08/23/2012 08:06 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:40 PM, andrea crotti
> wrote:
>
>> What do you think?
>> Anything I can have a look at?
> There are a lot of multithreading examples in the Guide.
>
> If you want to introduce 0MQ, consider this sketch:
> http://www.zeromq.
Hi Arthur,
> Okay, so now that I've filed this bug (and proposed patch), how do I
> get someone to respond to it?
You make a github pull request to libzmq (and zeromq3-x), and one of
the several kind maintainers will press the Merge button, and your
patch will make it into the codebase. Since you
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:40 PM, andrea crotti
wrote:
> What do you think?
> Anything I can have a look at?
There are a lot of multithreading examples in the Guide.
If you want to introduce 0MQ, consider this sketch:
http://www.zeromq.org/topics:omq-is-just-sockets
-Pieter
Okay, so now that I've filed this bug (and proposed patch), how do I
get someone to respond to it? Obviously we'd prefer someone to accept
the patch. Even for the maintainer to say "Sorry, ZMQ is not tested
on Thumb2 and we're not interested in supporting it" would be a
helpful result.
https
Hi everyone, I'm not 100% sure yet but in the next PyConUK
(http://2012.pyconuk.net/) I should give a talk about zeromq..
I decided to propose it because I was going to learn it for work, and I
hope I'll be ready for the end of September.
Anyway suggestions are welcome, and it would be nice if I
Thanks for your patience. I hope, I can ask you questions which are not
basic henceforth.
On 23 August 2012 18:02, Chuck Remes wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2012, at 4:21 AM, girish kumar wrote:
>
> > >> Typically, we do zero MQ bind to a port in publisher code. But, in
> this case how to bind the multipl
First an update, I tried the 2.2 build from a virgin machine (also Debian
64bit) yesterday. I encountered strange build problems along the way, I
think automake related, but I was able to copy config/config.sub files from
my original attempt and finally...
I got a working .so and .jar
I'm sor
On Aug 23, 2012, at 4:21 AM, girish kumar wrote:
> >> Typically, we do zero MQ bind to a port in publisher code. But, in this
> >> case how to bind the multiple publisher threads on to the same port. This
> >> is fine with subscriber threads as they simply do zero MQ socket connect.
Use a FORWA
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Victor Perron wrote:
> I have a question (for you or others who may know) : is jeromq compatible
> then with the main push/pull, pub/sub methods of ZeroMQ via TCP, towards a
> v2.2 client or server ?
>
> I think I have seen somewhere that the 3.x compatibility ha
Dear Min,
I have a question (for you or others who may know) : is jeromq compatible
then with the main push/pull, pub/sub methods of ZeroMQ via TCP, towards a
v2.2 client or server ?
I think I have seen somewhere that the 3.x compatibility had been resolved
in libzmq, so that a 3.x and a 2.2 endp
Hi Thanks for your response.
On 22 August 2012 18:31, Chuck Remes wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 2:17 AM, girish kumar wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have started recently working on zero MQ. We could able to run the
> sample applications successfully.
> >
> > We have two problems, which we are f
Hi!
I added the suggested line and it is working perfectly now, once more,
thank you a lot! You saved me weeks of work and issues!
//Jonas
> Hello,
>
> If you don't set SUBSCRIBE, sub socket will block.
>
> please add the following line before connect.
>
> subscriber.subscribe("") // please
I worked on getting zmq working on android using jeromq today, and i got
it working perfectly with no issues using the latest sources from git
("tcp://els-mifr-00:61723"). Simply add the sources to a android project
and compile, worked on second try (forgot internet permissions on first,
doh).
I h
26 matches
Mail list logo
