that did it. thanks
I now have a working "Asynchronous Client-Server pattern" with clients and
workers in Perl and the intermediary device in C.
thanks again
Nishant
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Daisuke Maki wrote:
> Ah, I see you looked at the SYNOPSIS only, and didn't read the rest of t
I'd rather have my docs relatively sparse and let the official zeromq
guide/docs show The Correct Way, than write a lot of docs and have
contradicting explanations ;)
That said, I think I didn't include a link to the official docs, which
I should have done. My bad there.
2012/12/28 Pieter Hintjens
Ah, I see you looked at the SYNOPSIS only, and didn't read the rest of the docs.
The SYNOPSIS was a copy from LibZMQ2, so it was wrong:
zmq_send($socket, $msg, $flags);
Should read
zmq_send($socket, $buffer, $size, $flags);
So your client.pl is actually doing
zmq_send($socket, "your m
Hello,
I'm just announcing an almost usable version of lsd (Local Service
Discovery) , which goal is to fulfil one of the needs stated in the Guide:
have a simple high-level binding on the top of zyre.
It comes with a simple binding in python, and should be ported to Java
almost as easily, especia
I think the problem is one of documentation on the Perl binding, which
is a bit sparse.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Michel Pelletier
wrote:
> Can you provide us a minimal example of what's not working for you? It's
> just a flag to send(). It certainly works in all other languages and ther
Michael/Pedro,
I uploaded my worker and client code on https://gist.github.com/4392186
client sends a message with 2 parts and then expects a response. worker
expected 2 part message and then sends a response.
I get an error on line #21 "Argument is not an object" in worker.
thanks for your hel
Hi,
On 27/12/2012, at 20:46, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> Has anyone been able to make multipart msgs work with Perl? could you point
> me to documentation online or better code?
Sure, works fine. Just make sure you are using the ZMQ::LibZMQ3 bindings, those
are the most up-to-date and stable.
B
Can you provide us a minimal example of what's not working for you? It's
just a flag to send(). It certainly works in all other languages and there
are copious examples in the guide and in the examples repository.
https://github.com/imatix/zguide/tree/master/examples/Perl
-Michel
On Thu, Dec 2
Has anyone been able to make multipart msgs work with Perl? could you point
me to documentation online or better code?
thanks
Nishant
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Up to now the only docs are on http://czmq.zeromq.org/.
I'll look at writing a full Guide for CZMQ in 2013, since the library
is getting quite a lot of use.
-Pieter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Claudio Carbone wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 11:20 AM, Andy Ballingall TF wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> CZMQ's zl
On 12/27/2012 11:20 AM, Andy Ballingall TF wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CZMQ's zloop reactor ( http://czmq.zeromq.org/manual:zloop ) is a
> handy thing
I didn't know of any of this, I gave a quick look but I can't find any
extensive documentation for these features (I was hoping for something
like the ZMQ
upgrading the version to 3.2.2 fixed the issue.
thanks to everyone for chiming in :)
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> Andy, taotetek on IRC suggested to try telnet.. and i confirmed telnet
> works in both directions.. so it couldnt be the firewall.. rt?
>
> pieterh thi
Do you want to try fixing that bug, or shall I take a look?
-Pieter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Andy Ballingall TF
wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 16:22, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> Andy,
>>
>> You can trace this quite simply; print the tickless timer value before
>> each zmq_poll in zloop. It
Andy, taotetek on IRC suggested to try telnet.. and i confirmed telnet
works in both directions.. so it couldnt be the firewall.. rt?
pieterh thinks it could be the version mismatch on the 2 machines.. 1 has
3.2.0 and the other (my machine) has 3.2.2
I am going to upgrade the version and see if t
... and
sudo service iptables start
restarts the firewall again, I should add!
On 27 December 2012 16:44, Andy Ballingall TF
wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 16:16, Nishant Mittal wrote:
>> they are on the same network.. i can check if Ubuntu firewalls are playing a
>> role..
> The easiest thing t
On 27 December 2012 16:16, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> they are on the same network.. i can check if Ubuntu firewalls are playing a
> role..
The easiest thing to do (if safe to do so) would be to temporarily
switch off the firewall entirely. If it starts working, then that's
the reason! If you're usin
On 27 December 2012 16:22, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Andy,
>
> You can trace this quite simply; print the tickless timer value before
> each zmq_poll in zloop. It should change when you add your new timer.
Indeed, but even if the value is initially correct, the problem is
that the zombie deletion
Andy,
You can trace this quite simply; print the tickless timer value before
each zmq_poll in zloop. It should change when you add your new timer.
-Pieter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Andy Ballingall TF
wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> On 27 December 2012 13:55, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> On Thu, De
they are on the same network.. i can check if Ubuntu firewalls are playing
a role..
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Andy Ballingall TF <
balling...@thefoundry.co.uk> wrote:
> Could it be a firewall issue?
>
> On 27 December 2012 16:03, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> > Apostolis, client knows how to
Could it be a firewall issue?
On 27 December 2012 16:03, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> Apostolis, client knows how to resolve 'nishant' and the request is actually
> coming to the worker.. its the response thats not going back.
> and i tried with IP as well, same result.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec
Apostolis, client knows how to resolve 'nishant' and the request is
actually coming to the worker.. its the response thats not going back.
and i tried with IP as well, same result.
thanks
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <
xekou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How can the cli
Hi Pieter,
On 27 December 2012 13:55, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Andy Ballingall TF
> wrote:
>
>> Note how my timer registration succeeds, but the polling seems to
>> ignore it?
>
> Then it's because the tickless timer is being miscalculated; it should
> be re-calc
How can the client know what "nishant" means? Put the ip address instead.
2012/12/26 Nishant Mittal
> Hi All,
> I have a zmq_proxy device with ROUTER and DEALER in the front and back
> (attached code broker.c)
> router binds to tcp://*:5551 and dealer binds to tcp://*:6551
> the client connects
thanks Joshua and Tom.
I was not sure as i just signed up yesterday and sent a question and didnt
get any responses yet.
thanks
Nishant
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Joshua Foster wrote:
> Confirmed
>
> Nishant Mittal
> December 27, 2012 10:26 AM
> testing if my emails are going throug
Got it.
-Original Message-
From: Nishant Mittal
Reply-to: ZeroMQ development list
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject: [zeromq-dev] test email
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:26:25 -0500
testing if my emails are going through to the list.. can someone pls
confirm.
thanks
--
Nishant Mit
Confirmed
Nishant Mittal
December 27, 2012
10:26 AM
testing if my emails are going
through to the list.. can someone pls confirm.thanks--
Nishant Mittal
Director, Product DevelopmentRosenblatt Securities Inc.20 Broad StreetNew
York, NY 10005
Di
testing if my emails are going through to the list.. can someone pls
confirm.
thanks
--
*Nishant Mittal*
Director, Product Development
*Rosenblatt Securities Inc*.
20 Broad Street
New York, NY 10005
Direct: 212-607-3159
Mobile: 646-504-2629
___
zeromq-
zloop code seems correct. In some old code of mine, that uses zmq_poll , I
was creating a socket to wake the poll, which doesnt make sense, since I
had also calculated the new timeout before the poll locks the thread.
If i remember correctly, I had similar problems. Maybe it was my mistake,
or mayb
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Andy Ballingall TF
wrote:
> Note how my timer registration succeeds, but the polling seems to
> ignore it?
Then it's because the tickless timer is being miscalculated; it should
be re-calculated each time you add or remove a timer handler. If not,
there's a bug.
The blocking probably comes from the receiver not being able to process the
messages fast enough, and since you're using PUSH/PULL sockets, when you
reach the high-water mark, the sender will block.
Solutions: increase HWM, or make recipients faster.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Lushuifeng
Hi Pieter,
> Good catch. How are you adding/removing timers if not in a handler,
> though? As handlers are all finished before the next poll starts, this
> should work.
I was only adding the timer from within the handler which was called
as a result of the reactor receiving a message. I've just p
Hi KIU,
On 27 December 2012 11:13, KIU Shueng Chuan wrote:
> If you have already started the reactor, are you not then trying to add a
> timer from another thread? The code is not thread-safe, so you shouldn't be
> doing it.
>
I was only adding a timer from within a handler attached to the
reacto
If you have already started the reactor, are you not then trying to add a
timer from another thread? The code is not thread-safe, so you shouldn't be
doing it.
On Dec 27, 2012 6:21 PM, "Andy Ballingall TF"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CZMQ's zloop reactor ( http://czmq.zeromq.org/manual:zloop ) is a
> handy
Hi Andy,
Good catch. How are you adding/removing timers if not in a handler,
though? As handlers are all finished before the next poll starts, this
should work.
-Pieter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Andy Ballingall TF
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CZMQ's zloop reactor ( http://czmq.zeromq.org/manual:
Hi:
I'm using zmq(3.2 version) to do message transmission and distribution
currently, however, several problems has encountered me and I'm hoping to get
help from you, my question is listed as below:
First, in order to accelerate the processing speed of the end of the receiving
message, I exte
Hi Pieter,
On 22 December 2012 12:06, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Yes, this seems to be a bug. I've logged an issue
> https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-487 and uploaded a test case:
> https://github.com/zeromq/issues/blob/master/487/issue.c.
>
Thanks!
> However I'd advise against retrying a con
Hi,
CZMQ's zloop reactor ( http://czmq.zeromq.org/manual:zloop ) is a
handy thing, but one thing caught me out.
In my design, after starting a reactor (with zloop_start()), I wanted
to later add a timer (with zloop_timer() ). However, this timer didn't
appear to fire when expected (or at all).
Guys I solved the problem. Turns out I can't do this from RESPONDER:
ZmqSocket receive_worker = context.CreateSocket(SocketType.PUSH);
while (true)
{
something
receive_worker.Connect(response_address);
receive_worker.SendMessage(response_zmqmessage);
receive_worker.Disc
38 matches
Mail list logo
