On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Alan Vogt wrote:
> You were right. There was something not right with my build.
> In this case it was my build of the CZMQ library.
I always just "make install" on libzmq and then czmq, without any
options, and it always works.
-Pieter
___
Hey Pieter:
You were right. There was something not right with my build.
In this case it was my build of the CZMQ library. I had configured with
--prefix so that would know where to put the CZMQ output files.
But I had neglected to give a hint about where my new 3.2 library is for
zmq itself
Hi Rakesh,
Can you reproduce this with a minimal test case?
-Pieter
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Rakesh Patel
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am trying to send multi-part messages using zmq_send function. In the last
> message, i set send_more to zero and this is zero sized message. On the
> receiving
Hi ,
I am trying to send multi-part messages using zmq_send function. In the
last message, i set send_more to zero and this is zero sized message. On
the receiving end using zmq_recv, it sets zmq errno 156384763 when
receiving last message. In the documentation, it has written "You may send
zero-l
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Yucheng Low wrote:
>
> Initial testing suggests that it seems to work fine, allowing all
> subscribers to receive every message regardless of the hwm. A limitation is
> that I cannot use zmq_poll to test if the PUB socket is writeable. (A
> conservative option is
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:37 AM, howard chen wrote:
> I am not sure if anyone have thinking about this idea before.
> Any caveat or reason why this approach is not popular/mature?
It's an old idea that works well,
I think, people who use HTTP for communications tend to be blind to
asynchronous
