On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Mohit Jaggi wrote:
> I understand, but the caller does not control if the message is stored in
> VSM or on heap(since choice is made inside zmq code). So zmq has to somehow
> copy the VSM before the message variable goes out of scope. Just want to
> confirm that
Hi,
HWM 1000 might not be big enough in some PUB/SUB patterns.
Please increase the value or unlimited (-1). Or please update your test case
somewhere as other can reproduce it.
Thanks
Min
On Mar 9, 2013, at 9:00 PM, Erwin Karbasi wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are using Pub/Sub paradigm in 0MQ
I understand, but the caller does not control if the message is stored in
VSM or on heap(since choice is made inside zmq code). So zmq has to somehow
copy the VSM before the message variable goes out of scope. Just want to
confirm that zmq does that.
Or is it not OK to use zmq_msg_t on stack and it
