Set the HWM before connecting or binding.
On Jun 25, 2013 2:36 AM, "David Cheney" wrote:
>
> I have s simple "Sender" S.java and "Receiver" R.java using jzmq. I start
> the receiver, then the sender. I stop the receiver after it has received
> about 350 messages; the sender reports queuing 1000
>From my tests this evening, it looks like zmq_poll does have an appreciable
cost (plus the overhead of being wrapped in Python), and will be notably
slower than a simple `while True: s.recv()`. But I did find some
inefficiencies in the Poller implementation, which should be addressed by PR
#381 <
I have s simple "Sender" S.java and "Receiver" R.java using jzmq. I start
the receiver, then the sender. I stop the receiver after it has received
about 350 messages; the sender reports queuing 1000 messages - so far so
good. I restart and quickly stop the receiver. It reports receiving all
but
I've used both clrzmq2 and pyzmq successfully on windows with no trouble at
all. (clrzmq can be gotten from NuGet and pyzmq from
https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/downloads (just pick the right one for your
python version)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> We have a require
Steven/Doron, this sounds very promising.. I will start with the native
Java binding first. Steve, its cool that you are in Manhattan, if we cant
get JeroMQ working in a day.. i'll need your help.. thanks again.
Nishant
*Nishant Mittal*
Director, Product Development
*Rosenblatt Securities Inc*.
yeah that matches
thanks
Nishant
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Neylor Ohmaly Rodrigues e Silva <
nohros@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check if the DLL that you are using matches your machine processor
> architecture(x68/x64).
>
>
> 2013/6/24 Nishant Mittal
>
>> We have a requirement to write a sm
On 24 June 2013 13:09, Nishant Mittal wrote:
> We have a requirement to write a small windows client that uses a SUB/DLR
> socket to connect to a PUB/RTR running on a linux machine. We tried a lot
> of different ways (Java, .NET) but couldnt get the client to work on
> windows.. windows keeps com
If you are using .net you can try NetMQ which is native port of zeromq.
https://github.com/zeromq/netmq
On Jun 24, 2013 8:09 PM, "Nishant Mittal" wrote:
> We have a requirement to write a small windows client that uses a SUB/DLR
> socket to connect to a PUB/RTR running on a linux machine. We tr
Check if the DLL that you are using matches your machine processor
architecture(x68/x64).
2013/6/24 Nishant Mittal
> We have a requirement to write a small windows client that uses a SUB/DLR
> socket to connect to a PUB/RTR running on a linux machine. We tried a lot
> of different ways (Java, .
We have a requirement to write a small windows client that uses a SUB/DLR
socket to connect to a PUB/RTR running on a linux machine. We tried a lot
of different ways (Java, .NET) but couldnt get the client to work on
windows.. windows keeps complaining zmq.dl not found.
Any ideas are welcome.. I a
I think I have found some stuff on PECL that my point me in the right direction.
James
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:32 PM, James Marcus wrote:
> Hi,
> When running phpize
>
> build machine:
> [jmarcus@ohitu001 SPECS]$ phpize -v
> Configuring for:
> PHP Api Version: 20100412
> Zend Module A
Hi,
When running phpize
build machine:
[jmarcus@ohitu001 SPECS]$ phpize -v
Configuring for:
PHP Api Version: 20100412
Zend Module Api No: 20100525
Zend Extension Api No: 220100525
target install machine:
[root@ws300 x86_64]# phpize -v
Configuring for:
PHP Api Version: 20100
Thanks Min - additionally if I'm incorrect in my assumption that the poll
look in my example code should perform better, or if there's a better way
to do what I'm doing just let me know.
The example code polls only one socket (which isn't that useful, hah) but I
wanted to keep the test case dirt s
Thanks for the report, I will look into whether I have introduced a performance
degradation in the last few iterations.
-MinRK
On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:27, Brian Knox wrote:
> It's been awhile since I've used pyzmq, and I'm running into a performance
> issue using Poller.poll().
>
> With a si
Watch out for phpize etc. being from the older version - that's an easy
mistake to make. Maybe uninstall the previously installed version to clear
out any associated components.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, James Marcus wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> Thanks for the quick reply. So Built PHP 5.4.16 and
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the quick reply. So Built PHP 5.4.16 and then installed it
on my build server and then created the ZeroMQ binaries. I'll give it
another go incase I did something out of order.
Thanks
James
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ian Barber wrote:
> You'll need to build php-zmq wi
You'll need to build php-zmq with the version you're running - looked like
the ZMQ extension was built with an older version of PHP.
Ian
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM, James Marcus wrote:
> Hi,
> I have compiled my own PHP version, 5.4.16 and ZeroMQ 3.2.2, and
> rolled my own RPMs. When I st
Hi,
I have compiled my own PHP version, 5.4.16 and ZeroMQ 3.2.2, and
rolled my own RPMs. When I start php-fpm I get the following message:
Starting php-fpm: [24-Jun-2013 11:01:49] NOTICE: PHP message: PHP
Warning: PHP Startup: zmq: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with module API=2009
It's been awhile since I've used pyzmq, and I'm running into a performance
issue using Poller.poll().
With a simple blocking recv() in a while True loop, I get ~ 300k messages a
second.
With the simplest case of the same code using a poll on the socket, I get ~
30k messages a second.
(pyzeromq)t
Am 23.06.2013 um 18:48 schrieb Daniel Krikun :
> I have started to implement this feature, and thought, what would be the
> desired behavior in case of multi-part messages? Are multi-part messages to
> be considered as one, or to be forbidden as altogether on a "conflate" socket
> as a not-rea
20 matches
Mail list logo
