I was wrong about detecting sent/no-sent messages on PUB socket
using poller and POLLOUT events. I have muddle up this with PUSH,
because for PUSH this approach works.
Sorry for confusion
2013/9/26 Pieter Hintjens :
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Artem Vysochyn
> wrote:
>
>> Quick ques
I have been looking into the monitor mechanism and I think there are several
shortcomings, that I would like to address. I would like some opinions on these
points before diving into the code.
1. We really need two separate "disconnected" events: one "local_close"
for when the local sock
Thanks for finding this. I've merged your patch.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Timothee Besset wrote:
> This is failing because it's an out of tree compile. In addons/Makefile.am:
> makecert_LDADD = $(top_srcdir)/src/libczmq.la
>
> Sending a pull request soon
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:3
This is failing because it's an out of tree compile. In addons/Makefile.am:
makecert_LDADD = $(top_srcdir)/src/libczmq.la
Sending a pull request soon
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Timothee Besset wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following error trying to compile latest czmq on OSX:
>
>
Thanks Michel,
Deleting the disconnect line actually solved both issue!
Gonzalo Vásquez Sáez
Gerente Investigación y Desarrollo (R&D)
Altiuz Soluciones Tecnológicas de Negocios Ltda.
Av. Nueva Tajamar 555 Of. 802, Las Condes - CP 7550099
+56 2 335 2461
gvasq...@altiuz.cl
http://www.altiuz.cl
http:
On 09/27/2013 12:49 PM, Riskybiz wrote:
> When this is received at the client end it is a jumbled mess of random
> characters.
Where do you observe the garbage first? In reply, repStr, buffer or
obj1?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.
Trying to get to grips with how to serialize an object and send/receive it
via zeromq I've modified the Hello World example from the zeromq
documentation to try and achieve this. Code is below.
Whilst the server appears to be outputting a sensible:
Sent Reply: 22 serialization::archive 10
Thank you Matt.
2013/9/27 Matt Connolly :
> No, ZMQ sockets never generate ZMQ_POLLERR.
>
> On 27/09/2013, at 8:06 AM, Artem Vysochyn wrote:
>
>> hi Matt,
>>
>> Thanks for reply. But if I use only ZMQ socket everywhere in
>> application, then should poller-s catch ZMQ_POLLERR along with
>> ZMQ_P
