Personally I'm using the direct buffer as a memory arena (I preallocate a
pool) and I avoid one allocation like:
*> zmq_msg_t msg;*>* zmq_msg_init (&msg);*>* zmq_recvmsg
((void *) socket, &msg, flags);*>* int size = zmq_msg_size
(&msg);*
*//might check for out of bounds and retu
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> http://hintjens.com/blog:53
Regarding this specifically:
I don't see a way to safely share a certificate without some shared secret,
> or resorting to a third party, CA-style. Even if I encrypt the certificate
> with the recipient's publ
I've been working on a certificate format of my own ;) Would be great to
combine efforts! I'm still rather open on a number of details.
https://github.com/cryptosphere/cif
I'm also in the "gathering requirements" phase, you won't find much of a
specification there. Having been up to my eyeballs i
This is awesome news... :-)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> On 1 October 2013 17:00, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>>
>> - JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java
>> version
>
>
> Technically there is now, just not complete and requires JDK 7.
>
> http
On 1 October 2013 17:00, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> - JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java
> version
>
Technically there is now, just not complete and requires JDK 7.
https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm
___
zeromq-dev maili
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Artem Vysochyn
wrote:
> Still totaly confused... Why need to port something on something? Why
> then not create php-port or python-port?
There is a .Net port. I've heard rumours there is a pure Python stack
floating around. There is a node.js stack. I've even se
Still totaly confused... Why need to port something on something? Why
then not create php-port or python-port?
What bothers most, if this is "a port", then it should mandate "what
exactly is currently supported and what is not, what is supported with
limitations", and so on.
Or should I just beli
You may want to add this to the FAQ or somewhere on the wiki:
- the two stacks are comparable in performance but it depends on
message size and frequency
- the two stacks are identical at the API and protocol level, and
fully interchangeable
- JeroMQ matches ZeroMQ stable 3.2 whereas JZMQ may soon
According to my previous tests, jzmq and JeroMQ are on par in terms of
performance.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Lun, Nicholas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ** **
>
> I wanted to ask your opinion on JeroMQ as an alternative to the Java
> binding you have available. Performance-wise it is my under
Actually, the question in subj.
Q1: What are compeling reasons one should know so that they could turn
him into JeroMQ?
Q2: What's true about JeroMQ:
- better supported?
- community more responsive?
- community has quicker turnaround (in terms of features)?
- battle tested (has prod deployments)?
I've added a small section to the download page, at the end of
http://zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software.
-Pieter
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> Someone should add it clearly to the wiki, yes.
>
> It might be good to provide language-specific sections on the Download
>
Someone should add it clearly to the wiki, yes.
It might be good to provide language-specific sections on the Download
page for the main languages at least.
It's mentioned on https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq.
it's as official as any other ZeroMQ project, part of our
organization, and there has bee
Hi Pieter,
JeroMQ. I was on http://zeromq.org/bindings:java and could not find
any info on JeroMQ.
Q: is this offcially maintained zmq java binding/port/whatever?
Thanks
2013/10/1 Pieter Hintjens :
> Nick,
>
> The general advice is to use JeroMQ to start with and move to JZMQ
> later when / i
Hi Julien,
Looks like you're right on both counts. Do you want to send a patch to fix this?
Here's our contribution process: http://zeromq.org/docs:contributing
Cheers
Pieter
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:16 PM, julien tayon wrote:
> First Point
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/src/cl
First Point
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/src/clock.cpp#L75
Here I see you use monotonic clock
But according to the man clock_gettime
I read :
CLOCK_MONOTONIC
Clock that cannot be set and represents monotonic time since
some unspecified starting point.
CL
Hi Martin,
For adding traceability, I think it does fit the use case. I don't know what
others are thinking regarding the use of this functionality.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
DCV Chile
> -Original Message-
> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-
> boun...@lists.zeromq
On 2013-10-01 16:09, gonzalo diethelm wrote:
> OK, this is what I am thinking, in a very rough first cut, of how
> ZMQ_MONITOR should work. Some notes follow. Comments are welcome.
What about the fact that monitoring events are queued and thus delivered
with a delay? By the time you get CONNECTED
Nick,
The general advice is to use JeroMQ to start with and move to JZMQ
later when / if you need it.
-Pieter
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Lun, Nicholas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I wanted to ask your opinion on JeroMQ as an alternative to the Java binding
> you have available. Performance-wis
Hi all,
I wanted to ask your opinion on JeroMQ as an alternative to the Java binding
you have available. Performance-wise it is my understanding that the C library
will be as fast or faster, but I find the maintenance easier since JeroMQ is
easier to upgrade. What are your opinions?
Regards,
N
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, gonzalo diethelm wrote:
> 1. Some sockets don’t have identities, hence the need to print the
> socket descriptor in a portable way.
Socket type as printable string? In most applications that's enough to
identify the socket.
> 2. Some sockets DO have
Some thoughts on this...
- I really like the idea of text events that can be easily parsed, and
trivially printed for debugging
- Instead of socket numbers, we could use printable identities
- Instead of event numbers, we could use short string constants
- name=value pairs is a great idea
-Pieter
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:21:58AM +, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> I've started to collect requirements, in the hope we can make a standard
> format.
Unfortunately I don't see a simple possibility for the other side to
verify if my certificate has not been forged (Certificate Signing).
Though you
Some months ago, I could build libzmq, czmq and libcurve under MinGW,
and also via cross-compilation. I remember I had to suppress the
hardcoded compiler/linker substitute CC=gcc in
builds/mingw32/Makefile.mingw32, and do : mingw32-make -f Makefile.mingw32
Finally, I found it easier to use cro
Yes, sure, since PARANO won't exist without libsodium. But then, what
about these platforms which may use curve and libsodium ?
The different other alternatives I can list are :
1) test at build time the compatibility with c++11 and build PARANO
on this condition only. I don't know how to do
Yes, we added a full NoSQL emulation layer in the 3.1.3 release last
April 1st. :)
-Pieter
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Bo Kohut wrote:
> http://apmdigest.com/delivering-better-mobile-app-performance-with-html5
>
> ___
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> z
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Ho-Gyun Choi wrote:
> Again, both working perfectly as you said it would.
Excellent news. Thanks for reporting the problems and testing the fix.
Can I ask, are you making an application based on FileMQ? Will that be
open source?
-Pieter
__
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> If the goal is serializing keys and not full certificates, I'd strongly
> recommend a URI format
For individual keys, it's not difficult; we have an armoured text
format that now seems acceptable.
I've started a separate thread on certifica
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Laurent Alebarde wrote:
> Do you see some show-stoppers towards moving the libzmq and co compiler
> options to -std=c++11 ?
It may be a problem for some platforms... can we use that
conditionally, if we're building on libsodium?
__
Hi all,
As we build security layers around ZeroMQ, one of the fun parts will
be certificate formats.
I've started to collect requirements, in the hope we can make a standard format.
http://hintjens.com/blog:53
-Piieter
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zero
To Developers,
I usually prefer to deal with Linux, but I must now build a Windows client
application that makes use of ZMQ, CZMQ, and FMQ. I was able to build the
latest ZMQ successfully. Now I am trying to build the latest release of
CZMQ in Windows 7 x86_64 architecture. I have tried to use th
30 matches
Mail list logo
