On 12/29/2013 08:34 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
please go ahead and let us know here on the list how things go. I'm
personally not a fan of such events and won't take an active role.
So what part of Google paying students and mentors to work on ZeroMQ
projects do you dislike?
hi Pieter,
What you probably want to make, what most developers end up making, is
a framework that does the messaging you need (using ZeroMQ) and hides
this from your application.
100% true. This is what I'm doing. In java.
A TTL is hugely application dependent. Putting this into ZeroMQ
Hi all,
Sorry to come back with this, I am still blocked with my attempt to
proxy CURVE with ZMQ_STREAM. The problem is depicted here
(https://github.com/lalebarde/streamq-proxy) in the status.
As it is a festivity period, please welcome this last bottle in the sea.
Cheers,
Laurent
Le
Hold on, I am in progress.
Le 30/12/2013 12:03, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Hi all,
Sorry to come back with this, I am still blocked with my attempt to
proxy CURVE with ZMQ_STREAM. The problem is depicted here
(https://github.com/lalebarde/streamq-proxy) in the status.
As it is a
After some further testing with czmq, I have discovered that the behaviour of
not being able to read from a socket when not bound is particular to the ruby
rbczmq bindings, and that czmq does not operate this way. I’m curious if other
bindings such as python are the same as czmq.
I can update
Good news: it works now.
TODO:
1.
Test multi-part messages.
2.
Test asynchronicity (send several messages before waiting for
responses).
3.
Extend to many clients workers.
Le 30/12/2013 13:03, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Hold on, I am in progress.
Le 30/12/2013 12:03,
Hi all,
As the repository for the F# ZMQ binding (hereafter, fszmq) has been recently
moved into the zeromq organization (on GitHub), I’m a bit confused as to
process. Specifically: should I continue to commit directly to the fszmq repo,
or should I fork it (under my personal GitHub account)
Hi Devs,
In *test_stream.cpp*, the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag is tested on receive with:
rc = zmq_msg_recv (identity, stream, 0);
assert (rc 0);
assert (zmq_msg_more (identity));
and is set with:
rc = zmq_msg_send (identity, stream, ZMQ_SNDMORE);
I note that *zmq_msg_recv* / *zmq_msg_send*
Hi all,
I would like to know how I can reliably authenticate a peer based on its
curve public_key value and its identity (assuming the zap_handler is
coupled with a ROUTER socket) ?
As the zap handler receive only the public_key value but client socket
identity. Is it safe to consider that the
Hello there,
This is the first I hear about the F# binding, great work there!
Your library seems to pretty much answer the same needs as clrzmq did,
except for the fact clrzmq is completely out of date (has not been updated
for over a year).
As an avid .NET and ØMQ user, I'd be happy to help
So I answer to myself: yes.
Le 30/12/2013 18:02, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Hi Devs,
In *test_stream.cpp*, the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag is tested on receive with:
rc = zmq_msg_recv (identity, stream, 0);
assert (rc 0);
assert (zmq_msg_more (identity));
and is set with:
rc = zmq_msg_send
Now it works with multipart messages and asynchronous messages.
TODO: Extend to many clients workers.
Le 30/12/2013 15:31, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Good news: it works now.
TODO:
1.
Test multi-part messages.
2.
Test asynchronicity (send several messages before waiting for
And how did you install libzmq? It seems like you have a borked install.
Perhaps rebuilding libzmq and/or pyzmq is the answer.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Thomas Johnson
thomas.j.john...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks, that was the problem. The broken one had 4.0.3 and the working one
had 2.2.0
Yeah I think you're right; I'm going to clean out and reinstall both of
those
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:41 PM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
And how did you install libzmq? It seems like you have a borked install.
Perhaps rebuilding libzmq and/or pyzmq is the answer.
On Sun, Dec 29,
This isn't directly related to ZeroMQ, but it is somewhat relevant now
given A) the addition of the (yet unimplemented) heartbeating feature in
ZMTP/3.0 and B) the Windows TCP keepalive parameters fix I committed
recently.
The question is: has someone here used TCP keepalives as a substitute
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Bjorn Reese bre...@mail1.stofanet.dk wrote:
So what part of Google paying students and mentors to work on ZeroMQ
projects do you dislike?
Specifically, I think it's a distortion of the natural economies of the project.
It is a delicate process to decide what
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM, artemv zmq artemv@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, true, TTL is abstract thing. But, with high probability, everyone
would want this: I want a setting of how long message lives in sending
_and/or_ receiving queue.
And yet you are the first person to request this
Hi all,
I would like to know how I can reliably authenticate a peer based on its
curve public_key value and its identity (assuming the zap_handler is
coupled with a ROUTER socket) ?
As the zap handler receive only the public_key value but client socket
identity. Is it safe to consider that
Hi guys,
I'm Moving the conversation that started here[1] to the mailing list in
request of @Miniway (I assume he/she is jeromqs leader).
My motivation for adding logging into jeromq:
1) It greatly improves debugging.
2) The performance impacts with logging turned off are minimal. And even if
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Nicolas Delaby tico...@free.fr wrote:
I would like to know how I can reliably authenticate a peer based on its
curve public_key value and its identity (assuming the zap_handler is
coupled with a ROUTER socket) ?
As the zap handler receive only the public_key
What sort of debugging are you trying to solve?
Logging statements can be done well and poorly.This also depends on what sort
of debugging is needed.
slf4j is an external library, have you considered using java.util.logging?
Joshua
On Dec 30, 2013, at 8:11 AM, pablo fernandez
I have to agree with Pieter. GSOC is a recriting tool for google. They
are paying students a pittence to see who among the hoard of respondents
rises above the rest so they can court the tiny fraction of those with
merit before any other companies. They offload the cost of vetting those
Here is a minimal test case:
#include zmqpp/zmqpp.hpp
int main()
{
zmqpp::context c;
zmqpp::socket s(c, zmqpp::socket_type::publish);
}
When I compile this with Clang's thread sanitizer and run it, I get:
==
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=4369)
Read of
Hi!
I have a bit of a design issue. I want to achieve this:
- Software receives a request on a DEALER socket from a ROUTER socket (think
the worker in paranoid pirate pattern).
- Request is executed asynchronously in the software. Result is ready inside
another thread.
- Send it back over the
I was reading the docs and saw:
How can I integrate ØMQ sockets with normal sockets? Or with a GUI event loop?
You can use the zmq_poll() function to poll for events on both ØMQ and normal
sockets. The zmq_poll() function accepts a timeout so if you need to poll and
process GUI
events in
Hey folks,
I’ve got a REQ-ROUTER architecture where clients (with a REP socket) connect to
a server (with a ROUTER socket). This connection is authenticated via CURVE.
I need to figure out some person/username/unique identifier that is associated
with the incoming REQ. There are a couple of
Have you thought about a custom frame at the top of your message?
Or the clients can set their own custom identity if they have unique names.
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:51 AM, Drew Crawford d...@sealedabstract.com
wrote:
Hey folks,
I’ve got a REQ-ROUTER architecture where clients
Well if I allow just any client to claim to be billgates that’s not going to be
very secure…
…or did I misunderstand your proposal?
On Dec 31, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Have you thought about a custom frame at the top of your message?
Or the clients can set
28 matches
Mail list logo
