> On 14.04.2016 09:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> >> So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our
> archives.
> >>
> >> Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
> >>
> >> Conventional email interface is a plus.
> >>
>
https://developers.google.com/admin-sd
I have to take back my vote for librelist. By chance I read some Mails
from Flask (a python web-framework) which used to host their
mailing-lists there and decided to move to mail.python.org. Turns out
librelist didn't use mailman and some users were unable to subscribe to
the list, while Zed S
You just add your email address to the google list - you don't actually
need a Google account. Thre is really no difference to now.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Jeff Shanab wrote:
> I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google
> group. :-(
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 a
In the mean time I found out that it is not necessary to change
anything. Just do gsl on mlm_client.xml (started from src folder as
required by Pieter).
I am working on ostri/malamute, but it should be in sync with
zeromq/malamute.
On 14.4.2016 16:33, Osiris Pedroso wrote:
Hi Matjaz,
Can you
Hi Matjaz,
Can you provide a repository with the modified file checked in?
I would like to try it as well.
Thanks,
Osiris
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:12 AM Matjaž Ostroveršnik <
matjaz.ostrovers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to add a new method to the mlm_client.xml and then regenerate
Thanks Bjorn,
that seems exactly like what I was looking for. And if I do it
correctly, I should be able to get a GSL template working that
translates (simple) FSMs into TLA+. If I ever come to that stage I'd be
glad to share it.
Seems kinda cool in my head: building nice networking protocols wit
Hi,
I tried to add a new method to the mlm_client.xml and then regenerate
all dependant files.
Generation of include/mlm_client.h is unsuccesful (i.e. one gets xml
garbage within the c header sources)
Am I doing something wrong or this is a bug?
Guys how do you regenerate when you change some
I'm in favor of Google groups, relative to the alternatives.
On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Greg Young wrote:
> Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but
> its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with
> its warts. The history of the group would be
Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but
its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with
its warts. The history of the group would be important to bring over
if possible (I do not know of an api for bringing it over).
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:45 AM,
Thanks I think I have some Ideas to try,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Auer, Jens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is zmq_msg_init_data which gets a callback which is called when the
> message is released. However, it is not fully zero-copy because some
> copying is done when receiving messages. With 4
Hi,
there is zmq_msg_init_data which gets a callback which is called when the
message is released. However, it is not fully zero-copy because some copying is
done when receiving messages. With 4.2, this is reduced, but until that, the
data is received into a fixed buffer and then copied into th
I created a minimal test case but couldn't reproduce the problem:
http://pastie.org/private/e9i8ikon6evtxfvbs5b4nq
The code is in go and I tag every request with an ID so the replies
match to the requests. I tried the handover flag but it doesn't help.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Doron Somec
Are you using identities for the clients? If so try enabling router
handover.
On Apr 14, 2016 12:13, "Pieter Hintjens" wrote:
> Can you make a minimal test case that reproduces this?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Luka Napotnik
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my client sends requests (as a
On 04/14/2016 11:30 AM, alex. wrote:
> Anyway after doing a little more research some papers indicated that a
> better approach for writing communication protocols would be
> communicating sequential processes (CSP). But they are somewhat of an
> antithesis to FSMs: their basic elements are proces
On 14 Apr 2016, at 08:41, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our archives.
>
> Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
>
> Conventional email interface is a plus.
Additional criterion (satisfied by Google Groups and m
I am writing an app in C++ and using libzmq directly, not much of the c++
wrapper stuff.
I am interested in zero copy or at least minimizing the number of copies of
large buffers.
But am running across an all too common issue, Each library used wants to
have their own memory management forcing me
Haha, yeah I was expecting no one would understand my request. The
troubles of being short and concise. I also forgot to include the links
I had prepared. :(
So as a short explanation, communicating sequential processes is a model
developed by Tony Hoare in 1978 which is sort of like state machine
Also a 'nay' on Google Groups from me.
And I also concur with Lionel Orry: Librelist is just awesome.
Personally I've had the best mailing list experience with lists hosted
their - although that might just say something about the quality of the
projects hosted there.
Afaik it also uses mailman an
On 14 Apr 2016, at 10:46, Jeff Shanab wrote:
> I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google group.
> :-(
I've no particular beef for or against Google Groups, but it is entirely
possible
to follow them like a normal mailing list. The signup feature is hidden a
lit
Also for defining protocols there is zproto (
https://github.com/zeromq/zproto) and to kick start your C project you
might check out zproject (https://github.com/zeromq/zproject). Both of them
are GSL tools so if they're not what your looking for the might help you as
an example for your on GSL pro
I am also a mostly silent lurker and will probably not follow a google
group. :-(
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Dinu Gherman
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a silent lurker here, but I would most likely stop following this list
> after a move to google groups. I don't like imposing the use of an account
I don't understand half of what you're asking :) But in any case do
take a look at the tiny FSM / C code generator
(https://github.com/imatix/gsl/blob/b0aa393a6d00df2859f21aab0ccf6f203e18db96/examples/fsm_c.gsl)
that I've used happily in a few projects already.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, al
First of all I wasn't really sure if it's okay to talk about the GSL
Universal Code Generator on this list, but I am writing anyway since it
didn't have its own mailing list. So forgive any insolence. :)
I was planning on writing my thesis about a traffic analysis resistant
multi-user file-transf
Can you make a minimal test case that reproduces this?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Luka Napotnik
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my client sends requests (as a DEALER socket) and the server (a ROUTER
> socket) handles the request and sends the reply back (taking the route
> path into account) . Now, a
Hello,
my client sends requests (as a DEALER socket) and the server (a ROUTER
socket) handles the request and sends the reply back (taking the route
path into account) . Now, at start, everything works but after awhile,
messages, sent from the client, don't get recv()-ed by the server
anymore. Wha
So an added criteria for any new platform is ability to import our archives.
Free is a plus iff the hosting business is long term reliable.
Conventional email interface is a plus.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Indradhanush Gupta
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
> Also usually a lurker here, but I am all in favor of Google Groups.
> Generally much better than the mailing list software. Can be a change for
> some people of course. But +1 from me for what it's worth.
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05
Also usually a lurker here, but I am all in favor of Google Groups.
Generally much better than the mailing list software. Can be a change for
some people of course. But +1 from me for what it's worth.
Jim
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Dinu Gherman
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a silent lurker here, b
Hi!
I'm a silent lurker here, but I would most likely stop following this list
after a move to google groups. I don't like imposing the use of an account
already connecting to lots of data where any email address anywhere would be
just what is needed. Sure, you can user other identities, but th
29 matches
Mail list logo
