Thanks Wes,
regarding exit, the doc says is it not mandatory ("it is polite"), but when
I explicity call stop on one side (which is the case in my scenario), I
would expect to receive the exit event on the other side, right ? this is
the case in UDP, and not in gossip ??
Looks like a bug to me.
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 14:15 +, simon.giese...@btc-ag.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, there are 186 open issues for libzmq on github (https://gi
> thub.com/zeromq/libzmq ), which is quite a lot IMO. I would offer to
> look through all of them, add appropriate labels to all issues (Bug,
> Featur
Hi,
currently, there are 186 open issues for libzmq on github
(https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq ), which is quite a lot IMO. I would offer to
look through all of them, add appropriate labels to all issues (Bug, Feature
Request, ...), maybe close duplicates or issues that have already been resol
iirc: the way the PING/PONG works- if nodes don’t see traffic from each-other
in 5s (?) they send an EVASIVE up the stack and send a PING/PONG. so if you’re
nodes are NOT “chatty” you may see lots of these if you don’t adjust the timers.
you may want to fiddle with the TIMEOUTs.
https://github.
Hello,
I am currently integrating zyre in my system, and I would like to be able
to equally use udp and gossip discovery.
I noticed that when I start two nodes using gossip discovery, I soon see
evasive events, which do not occur when using UPD : is this "work as
designed" ? It looks strange to m
