Frankly speaking, this problem would deserve one :-)
N.
De : zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
[mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] De la part de Charles Remes
Envoyé : jeudi 15 novembre 2012 14:58
À : ZeroMQ development list
Objet : Re: [zeromq-dev] Compatibility 3.1 - 3.2.1-rc2
I sen
Peter,
A ZMQ user has finally replied to the post. He elegantly moderated the author's
point of view.
I think it's enough to indicate to the readers that ZMQ is more than just a
buggy piece of code :-)
N.
De : zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [zeromq
x.fr Article - User feedback on ZMQ (for french
readers only)
Hi Nicolas,
I tried to post a comment but was unable to register for the website.
What's the conflict in the article?
-Pieter
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:09 PM, LECLERCQ Nicolas
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Could someone
Hi all,
Could someone react to the following (french) post please?
http://linuxfr.org/users/krunch/journaux/zeromq-et-les-mangoustes
The idea is clearly not to involve you in controversy. The aim is just to
have the zmq community's point of view on an article which content
conflicts with what is ex
