the PUB socket type. Ditto for XSUB/SUB. I've added a
> note to the RFC page to clarify this.
>
> There are no undocumented changes to the protocol. If you find any,
> those would be considered bugs.
>
> -Pieter
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Michael Compton
&
The spec does not refer to the xpub/xsub which are now available.
I would edit but I am not totally confident I understand fully the
semantics for the sockets, i.e. which other sockets are allowed to connect.
Also has there been any other undocumented changes to the protocol?
Spec link:
http:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:46:25 +1100
john skaller wrote:
> Sorry, confirm does this mean XREP/XREQ no longer exist at all?
> I assume that.. will remove from my binding. Agree this is source
> of needless confusion. Nice!
>
Yep, hoping to remove all mention of XREQ/XREP. Including documentation.
Hi All,
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/229#issuecomment-3786244
I will be resubmitting this patch again.
And if anyone would like to chime in with any thoughts on the issue
that would be great.
I'd be particularly interested in hearing from the regular internals
hackers, as this affect
It would be nice to see a Lab page for this.
I'm curious as to more details of what you envisage for such a system
John.
It could be interesting to get an exchange of ideas going for this.
For my part I am more interested in the concepts than DSL implementation
with Felix.
Cheers,
Michael
O
12 13:01:06 +1100
john skaller wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2012, at 12:08 PM, Michael Compton wrote:
>
> > Are you trying this against libzmq 3.1.1.
>
> 3.1.0 I think, from the tarball. I have the latest git repo so I could
> upgrade to that .. done .. here's the full pro
Are you trying this against libzmq 3.1.1.
I tried this numerous times and it never worked, yet worked first time
with 2.1.11, per my follow up email
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:04:14 +1100
john skaller wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2012, at 9:08 AM, Michael Compton wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:08:08 +
Michael Compton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do explicit message routing using Router/Dealer
> connection pattern, as documented in the zguide:
> http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all#toc49
>
> But the messages never arrive at the des
Hi,
I am trying to do explicit message routing using Router/Dealer
connection pattern, as documented in the zguide:
http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all#toc49
But the messages never arrive at the destination.
Please find the code here:
http://paste.lisp.org/display/127256#1
Program output here:
ht
Hi,
It could be possible to leverage the reporting and assertation
mechanism provided by existing unit test frameworks without actually
carrying out unit testing per say, or indeed writing the scripts in
said languages.
I developed an automated testing framework for a state-full HTTP
client/serve
Hi Pierre,
Sorry for the the confuse but that example is for clrzmq2 not ZeroMQ
Interop.
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 20:38 +, pierre8r-2...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> OS Windows XP
> Microsoft Visual C# 2008 Express
> https://github.com/imatix/zguide/blob/master/examples/C%23
Hi Pierre,
The .NET binding, clrzmq2, needs the libzmq binary to function, it is
only a binding of that library.
The choice of not packaging a binary is due to the fact that clrzmq2 is
cross platform and so packaging up a binary with it is not necessarily
appropriate.
The build process is pretty
While zapi is definitely cool and I can see your desire to have the
guide migrated to zapi, I'd still have sympathize with Martins point.
Expecting the other binding examples authors to come and migrate their
examples may be a bit much, and part of the value of guide, in my eyes,
is aa source of
Hi all,
I would like to propose the retirement of the original clrzmq binding.
This would just involve moving it to a less prominent place in the C#
binding page, probably at the end under the heading of deprecated
binding. Of course the repository would remain available.
This would leave Intero
ing the file - but you should be
> creating a dll and shipping 2 dlls. Still you need to configure libpath in
> visual studio to point to the directory with the libzmq.lib
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Michael Compton wrote:
>
> > But the jzmq was specifically looking for lib
; On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Michael Compton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:23 +0100, C. Huntz wrote:
> >> Le 15/03/2011 21:00, Michael Compton a écrit :
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am having problems building jzmq on Win32.
> >>&g
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:23 +0100, C. Huntz wrote:
> Le 15/03/2011 21:00, Michael Compton a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having problems building jzmq on Win32.
> >
> > I built libzmq to output a lib file (libzmq.lib), but when I try
> > building jmzq I get
Hi,
I am having problems building jzmq on Win32.
I built libzmq to output a lib file (libzmq.lib), but when I try
building jmzq I get around 20 errors of unresolved external symbols for
what seems like all the functions in libzmq.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Michael
__
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 13:28 +0100, Martin Lucina wrote:
> michael.comp...@littleedge.co.uk said:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sorry for the long subject name, I'm going to try and keep this short
> > because it gives me a headache, hehe.
> >
> > This is some what connected to the following from the mailin
Hi all,
I'm going to be in Hamburg at the end of the month for the European Lisp
Symposium, and I just wanted to put out a feeler to see if anyone else
would be in the area around then for maybe a mini meetup. Guido is from
the area so he should also be around then.
Cheers,
Michael
_
Disabling the GC in that way is unfortunately not possible.
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 21:17 +0100, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Michael Compton
> wrote:
>
> > I am open for correction on any of this and suggestions on how best to
> > deal with the
Hi all,
Sorry for the long subject name, I'm going to try and keep this short
because it gives me a headache, hehe.
This is some what connected to the following from the mailing list:
http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2010-September/005822.html
While developing the clrzmq2 and using
t; last year, and the same as currently in the repository.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Michael Compton
> wrote:
> > Please find attached some translate examples for the guide in C#.
> >
> > These code examples are hereby licensed under MIT/X
Please find attached some translate examples for the guide in C#.
These code examples are hereby licensed under MIT/X11 license.
Contents:
lruqueue.cs
lruqueue2.cs
identity.cs
rtdealer.cs
rtmama.cs
rtpapa.cs
asyncsrv.cs
zmsg.cs (For multipart message)
Cheers,
Michael
C# Examples 2.tar.bz2
Des
Jose
I know it's off-topic, but I'd tentatively recommend using one of the
other CLR bindings, either ZeroMQ Interop or clrzmq2.
The rational is that clrzmq1 is unlikely to move forward as I see it, I
am down as one of the maintainers but I'm unlikely to be making more
than the odd bug fix. Curr
Signed off.
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 00:06 +, Michael Compton wrote:
> Note added to remind users that options should be set before
> bind/connect to take effect.
>
> P.S. I haven't submitted a patch before so please double check it is ok,
> and let me know if
Michael Compton
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:01:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] Added note regarding setting sockopt before bind/connect
Signed-off-by: Michael Compton
---
doc/zmq_setsockopt.txt |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/zmq_setsockopt.txt b/doc/zmq_setsoc
Hi all,
There has been a lot updates to the clrzmq2 bindings recently and I
thought I'd announce some more highlights.
Some new devices added:
Forwarder
Streamer
AsyncReturn -> XREP <- PULL
Added socket object event handlers, these can then be passes to an
overload version of the static Contex
Hi Torsten,
This is usually a mismatch between target arch of the ZeroMQ lib and the
CLR binding e.g. 64bit ZeroMQ lib and 32bit CLR build.
Which CLR binding are you trying?
Cheers,
Michael
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:59 +0100, Torsten Langner wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tried to use C# with 0MQ bu
Hi everyone,
Just announcing a small update to the clrzmq binding.
Details:
ZMQ:
Added static poll method (Poller) to Context
Added Recv with timeout to Socket
Added application wide reference counted Context to socket
ZMQExt:
Added Serializing and Deserializing Send and Recv extension methods
In my opinion the format does not reflect how one would use them with C#
and clrzmq2, employing using blocks is more idiomatic C# code than
explicitly closing connections and terminating contexts.
I would personally rather they were kept as is, because it is the
intended usage pattern of the under
No problem, no offence taken, though in my personal opinion it's a
little counter productive to have many bindings targeting the same
language/framework.
The reason I created CLRZMQ2 was because I felt the original wasn't
idiomatic C# so I could hardly hold it against you, hehe.
The reference cou
You do know that clrzmq2 supported all of what you mentioned besides the
reference counting.
If you had of submitted a patch for clrzmq2 it would have been very
welcome.
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 09:00 -0200, Vinicius Chiele wrote:
> Great job Alex, your implementation is very clean and simple, I lik
I'm the primary author and maintainer of clrzmq2, it monitor for issue
and will endeavour to resolve them when they arise. I monitor the
mailing list and drop into #zeromq now and then.
I notice NUZQ seems to use lambdas, these were introduced in .NET 3.0, I
purposely kept clrzmq2 targeting .net 2
Hi Pieter,
Could you please replace the current clrzmq2 example for wuserver.cs,
there is an issue, it connects instead of binds.
Cheers,
Michael
//
// Weather update server
// Binds PUB socket to tcp://*:5556
// Publishes random weather updates
//
// Author: Michael Compton
// Email
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 23:04 +, Rui Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 21:14, Michael Compton
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 19:37 +, Rui Lopes wrote:
> >> I've just created [0] a NuGet package for clrzmq2 [1]. Currently, it
> >&g
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 19:37 +, Rui Lopes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just created [0] a NuGet package for clrzmq2 [1]. Currently, it
> bundles libzmq 2.0.10 (x86) and todays version of the clrzmq2 library.
> This should make it easy to get ZMQ running on .NET Windows, and
> particularly in Visual
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 09:25 -0600, John Unwin wrote:
> Martin,
> Here are psenvpub & sub - I noticed that the c# ZMQ class does not
> seem to have an enum for SendMore unless I misssed something :-) so
> I just put the literal 2 in the send call.
>
> Kind Regards
> John
> http://www.linkedin.c
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:09 +, T-zex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or
> write protected memory, when subscribing from multiple processes on
> the same port.
> I've noticed that if delay is introduced between each subscribtion
> this exception i
Some more example code, up to chapter 3 of guide.
Cheers,
Michael
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:27 +, Michael Compton wrote:
> Here is the first few examples from the 0MQ guide using the new clrzmq2,
> up to tasksink2.
>
> The others should be along in the next couple of days, ju
Here is the first few examples from the 0MQ guide using the new clrzmq2,
up to tasksink2.
The others should be along in the next couple of days, just wanted to
have something there to go with the binding.
Cheers,
Michael
C# Examples.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar
_
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 17:45 +, Michael Compton wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:18 +0000, Michael Compton wrote:
> > I recently started updating the clrzmq and decided to convert it to a
> > more idiomatic design for C#. But I would like to get some feedback on
> > the c
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:18 +, Michael Compton wrote:
> I recently started updating the clrzmq and decided to convert it to a
> more idiomatic design for C#. But I would like to get some feedback on
> the changes to find out if it would be acceptable to any current or
> prosp
I recently started updating the clrzmq and decided to convert it to a
more idiomatic design for C#. But I would like to get some feedback on
the changes to find out if it would be acceptable to any current or
prospective users.
My fork can be found at http://github.com/Guthur/clrzmq
It hasn't rea
44 matches
Mail list logo
